Song–Zhang v1: Gaussian transfer, the all-depth bound and its affine form
Part of the first version of Song–Zhang, Chapter Song–Zhang, first version: polynomial estimates and curvature ; the reading order is on the full proofs page.
Overview. We reconstruct Section 7 of Song & Zhang, 2026 ,
including the bounded test function used to transfer a curvature estimate to an
arbitrary isotropic law. Gaussian observations produce a regular posterior;
Letwin’s quadratic inequality controls its covariance on a short interval.
One bounded Lipschitz test retains a fixed amount of variance on a posterior
with controlled covariance. This proves a transfer for any curvature
profile, not only the iterated-logarithm profiles. We then apply
Theorem 7.3 , select a finite depth, and whiten to obtain the
affine assertion. Approximation passes only scalar Poincaré inequalities to
limits; no continuity of spectral objects or of the profile is required.
A bounded test detecting the Poincaré constant ¶ The established bounded-witness theorem of Klartag & Lehec, 2025, Theorem 20 , in the
version arXiv:2406.01324v2, states that for a log-concave law there is a
1-Lipschitz g g g with
Var μ ( g ) ≥ c 1 ψ μ 2 , ∥ g ∥ ∞ 2 ≤ C 1 Var μ ( g ) , \operatorname{Var}_\mu(g)\ge c_1\psi_\mu^2,
\qquad \|g\|_\infty^2\le C_1\operatorname{Var}_\mu(g), Var μ ( g ) ≥ c 1 ψ μ 2 , ∥ g ∥ ∞ 2 ≤ C 1 Var μ ( g ) , where c 1 , C 1 > 0 c_1,C_1>0 c 1 , C 1 > 0 are universal and ψ μ \psi_\mu ψ μ is the reciprocal Cheeger
constant. Corollary 21 and its following remark give
C P ( μ ) ≤ 4 ψ μ 2 , ψ μ 2 ≤ π C P ( μ ) . (1) C_P(\mu)\le4\psi_\mu^2,\qquad \psi_\mu^2\le\pi C_P(\mu). \tag{1} C P ( μ ) ≤ 4 ψ μ 2 , ψ μ 2 ≤ π C P ( μ ) . ( 1 ) These are literature inputs, not consequences of the new preprint.
If the bound for g g g is essential, clip to its essential range; this preserves
its almost-everywhere values and Lipschitz constant and makes its bound global.
For 0 < k = C P ( μ ) < ∞ 0<k=C_P(\mu)<\infty 0 < k = C P ( μ ) < ∞ , put σ 2 = Var μ g \sigma^2=\operatorname{Var}_\mu g σ 2 = Var μ g and
f = ( g − E g ) / σ f=(g-\mathbb E g)/\sigma f = ( g − E g ) / σ . Since σ 2 ≥ c 1 k / 4 \sigma^2\ge c_1k/4 σ 2 ≥ c 1 k /4 , there is a universal
B 0 ≥ 1 B_0\ge1 B 0 ≥ 1 such that
E f = 0 , E f 2 = 1 , sup ∣ f ∣ ≤ B 0 , Lip ( f ) ≤ B 0 / k . (2) \mathbb Ef=0,\quad \mathbb Ef^2=1,\quad
\sup|f|\le B_0,\quad \operatorname{Lip}(f)\le B_0/\sqrt k. \tag{2} E f = 0 , E f 2 = 1 , sup ∣ f ∣ ≤ B 0 , Lip ( f ) ≤ B 0 / k . ( 2 ) For instance take B 0 = max ( 1 , 2 C 1 , 2 / c 1 ) B_0=\max(1,2\sqrt{C_1},2/\sqrt{c_1}) B 0 = max ( 1 , 2 C 1 , 2/ c 1 ) .
The global bound in (2) is what pays for the exceptional covariance paths.
Gaussian observations and posterior martingales ¶ Take a regular isotropic initial law μ = e − W d x \mu=e^{-W}dx μ = e − W d x with
a I ⪯ D 2 W ⪯ b I aI\preceq D^2W\preceq bI a I ⪯ D 2 W ⪯ b I . Let X ∼ μ X\sim\mu X ∼ μ be independent of standard
Brownian motion B t B_t B t , set Y t = t X + B t Y_t=tX+B_t Y t = tX + B t , and let F t \mathcal F_t F t be the usual
augmentation of its observation filtration. The conditional distribution is
μ t ( d x ) = Z t − 1 e Y t ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 / 2 μ ( d x ) , Z t = ∫ e Y t ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 / 2 μ ( d x ) . (3) \mu_t(dx)=Z_t^{-1}e^{Y_t\cdot x-t|x|^2/2}\mu(dx),\qquad
Z_t=\int e^{Y_t\cdot x-t|x|^2/2}\mu(dx). \tag{3} μ t ( d x ) = Z t − 1 e Y t ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 /2 μ ( d x ) , Z t = ∫ e Y t ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 /2 μ ( d x ) . ( 3 ) For fixed x x x , multiplying likelihood ratios of independent Gaussian increments
on any finite partition gives the factor e x ⋅ Y t − t ∣ x ∣ 2 / 2 e^{x\cdot Y_t-t|x|^2/2} e x ⋅ Y t − t ∣ x ∣ 2 /2 .
Cylinder events generate the path sigma-field, so Bayes’ formula proves (3)
for the entire observation filtration. In particular
E t q = E [ q ( X ) ∣ F t ] \mathbb E_tq=\mathbb E[q(X)\mid\mathcal F_t] E t q = E [ q ( X ) ∣ F t ] .
For every Borel q q q of polynomial growth these are square-integrable
martingales: strong convexity of μ \mu μ gives all polynomial moments, and
conditional Jensen applies.
Write m t = E t X m_t=\mathbb E_tX m t = E t X , A t = Cov t X A_t=\operatorname{Cov}_tX A t = Cov t X , and
W t = Y t − ∫ 0 t m s d s \mathcal W_t=Y_t-\int_0^tm_sds W t = Y t − ∫ 0 t m s d s . For s < t s<t s < t , the future increments of B B B
are independent of X X X and the past, while
E [ m u ∣ F s ] = m s \mathbb E[m_u\mid\mathcal F_s]=m_s E [ m u ∣ F s ] = m s for u ≥ s u\ge s u ≥ s . Consequently
E [ W t − W s ∣ F s ] = 0 \mathbb E[\mathcal W_t-\mathcal W_s\mid\mathcal F_s]=0 E [ W t − W s ∣ F s ] = 0 .
All these quantities are integrable by
E ∣ m u ∣ 2 ≤ E ∣ X ∣ 2 \mathbb E|m_u|^2\le\mathbb E|X|^2 E ∣ m u ∣ 2 ≤ E ∣ X ∣ 2 . The process is continuous and has
quadratic covariation t I tI t I , so Lévy’s characterization makes it Brownian in the
observation filtration.
For completeness define
I q ( t , y ) = ∫ q ( x ) e y ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 / 2 μ ( d x ) I_q(t,y)=\int q(x)e^{y\cdot x-t|x|^2/2}\mu(dx) I q ( t , y ) = ∫ q ( x ) e y ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 /2 μ ( d x ) .
Gaussian tails permit differentiation locally in ( t , y ) (t,y) ( t , y ) , including around
t = 0 t=0 t = 0 . We have ∂ t I q + Δ y I q / 2 = 0 \partial_tI_q+\Delta_yI_q/2=0 ∂ t I q + Δ y I q /2 = 0 and
∇ y I q = I q x \nabla_yI_q=I_{qx} ∇ y I q = I q x . Itô’s formula followed by the quotient rule therefore
gives
d E t q = Cov t ( q , X ) ⋅ d W t . (4) d\mathbb E_tq=\operatorname{Cov}_t(q,X)\cdot d\mathcal W_t. \tag{4} d E t q = Cov t ( q , X ) ⋅ d W t . ( 4 ) These computations can first be stopped on ∣ Y t ∣ ≤ R |Y_t|\le R ∣ Y t ∣ ≤ R . To remove the stop,
conditional Cauchy--Schwarz, ordinary Cauchy--Schwarz and conditional Jensen
bound, for each finite T T T ,
E ∫ 0 T ∣ Cov t ( q , X ) ∣ 2 d t ≤ T ( E q ( X ) 4 E ∣ X ∣ 4 ) 1 / 2 < ∞ . \mathbb E\int_0^T|\operatorname{Cov}_t(q,X)|^2dt
\le T\big(\mathbb E q(X)^4\,\mathbb E|X|^4\big)^{1/2}<\infty. E ∫ 0 T ∣ Cov t ( q , X ) ∣ 2 d t ≤ T ( E q ( X ) 4 E ∣ X ∣ 4 ) 1/2 < ∞. Indeed the conditional squared covariance is at most
E t q 2 E t ∣ X ∣ 2 \mathbb E_tq^2\,\mathbb E_t|X|^2 E t q 2 E t ∣ X ∣ 2 . Continuity of Y Y Y and Itô isometry
then justify (4) without the stop. Bounded Borel tests, including the witness
f f f and f 2 f^2 f 2 , are included.
Taking q = x i q=x_i q = x i and q = x i x j q=x_ix_j q = x i x j in (4) yields
d m t = A t d W t , d A t = ∑ j U j , t d W j , t − A t 2 d t , (5) dm_t=A_t\,d\mathcal W_t,\qquad
dA_t=\sum_jU_{j,t}\,d\mathcal W_{j,t}-A_t^2dt, \tag{5} d m t = A t d W t , d A t = j ∑ U j , t d W j , t − A t 2 d t , ( 5 ) where U j , t = E t [ ( X j − m j , t ) ( X − m t ) ( X − m t ) T ] U_{j,t}=\mathbb E_t[(X_j-m_{j,t})(X-m_t)(X-m_t)^T] U j , t = E t [( X j − m j , t ) ( X − m t ) ( X − m t ) T ] .
The negative drift is − d m t d m t T -dm_tdm_t^T − d m t d m t T ; expanding X = m t + ( X − m t ) X=m_t+(X-m_t) X = m t + ( X − m t ) in the remaining
martingale terms leaves exactly the displayed third centered moment.
Every posterior is regular, with potential Hessian D 2 W + t I D^2W+tI D 2 W + t I .
Covariance exit from a fixed interval ¶ Let τ \tau τ be the first exit of A t A_t A t from ( I / 2 , 2 I ) (I/2,2I) ( I /2 , 2 I ) . For 0 < t ≤ 1 / 16 0<t\le1/16 0 < t ≤ 1/16 ,
P ( τ ≤ t ) ≤ 2 n exp [ − 1 / ( 2048 t ) ] . \mathbb P(\tau\le t)\le2n\exp[-1/(2048t)]. P ( τ ≤ t ) ≤ 2 n exp [ − 1/ ( 2048 t )] . For any centered log-concave Z Z Z of positive covariance A A A , the whitened
form of Theorem 25.1 gives
Var ( Z T D Z ) ≤ 8 ∥ A 1 / 2 D A 1 / 2 ∥ H S 2 ≤ 8 ∥ A ∥ o p 2 ∥ D ∥ H S 2 \operatorname{Var}(Z^TDZ)\le8\|A^{1/2}DA^{1/2}\|_{\rm HS}^2
\le8\|A\|_{\rm op}^2\|D\|_{\rm HS}^2 Var ( Z T D Z ) ≤ 8∥ A 1/2 D A 1/2 ∥ HS 2 ≤ 8∥ A ∥ op 2 ∥ D ∥ HS 2 for symmetric D D D . For S z = E [ ( z ⋅ Z ) Z Z T ] S_z=\mathbb E[(z\cdot Z)ZZ^T] S z = E [( z ⋅ Z ) Z Z T ] , trace duality and
Cauchy--Schwarz give
∣ ⟨ D , S z ⟩ ∣ = ∣ E [ ( z ⋅ Z ) ( Z T D Z − tr ( D A ) ) ] ∣ ≤ 8 z T A z ∥ A ∥ o p ∥ D ∥ H S . |\langle D,S_z\rangle|
=|\mathbb E[(z\cdot Z)(Z^TDZ-\operatorname{tr}(DA))]|
\le\sqrt{8z^TAz}\|A\|_{\rm op}\|D\|_{\rm HS}. ∣ ⟨ D , S z ⟩ ∣ = ∣ E [( z ⋅ Z ) ( Z T D Z − tr ( D A ))] ∣ ≤ 8 z T A z ∥ A ∥ op ∥ D ∥ HS . Thus ∥ S z ∥ H S 2 ≤ 8 ∥ A ∥ o p 2 z T A z \|S_z\|_{\rm HS}^2\le8\|A\|_{\rm op}^2z^TAz ∥ S z ∥ HS 2 ≤ 8∥ A ∥ op 2 z T A z .
Symmetry in all three indices of the third moment yields
∑ j ∣ U j z ∣ 2 = ∥ S z ∥ H S 2 \sum_j|U_jz|^2=\|S_z\|_{\rm HS}^2 ∑ j ∣ U j z ∣ 2 = ∥ S z ∥ HS 2 , so before τ \tau τ
∑ j U j , t 2 ⪯ 64 I . (6) \sum_jU_{j,t}^2\preceq64I. \tag{6} j ∑ U j , t 2 ⪯ 64 I . ( 6 ) Set M u = ∫ 0 u ∧ τ ∑ j U j , s d W j , s M_u=\int_0^{u\wedge\tau}\sum_jU_{j,s}d\mathcal W_{j,s} M u = ∫ 0 u ∧ τ ∑ j U j , s d W j , s .
For symmetric matrices M , T M,T M , T and θ > 0 \theta>0 θ > 0 ,
D 2 tr ( e θ M ) [ T , T ] ≤ θ 2 tr ( e θ M T 2 ) . (7) D^2\operatorname{tr}(e^{\theta M})[T,T]
\le\theta^2\operatorname{tr}(e^{\theta M}T^2). \tag{7} D 2 tr ( e θM ) [ T , T ] ≤ θ 2 tr ( e θM T 2 ) . ( 7 ) Diagonalize M M M . The coefficient of T i j 2 T_{ij}^2 T ij 2 on the left is θ 2 \theta^2 θ 2
times the logarithmic mean of e θ m i , e θ m j e^{\theta m_i},e^{\theta m_j} e θ m i , e θ m j .
This mean equals ∫ 0 1 e θ [ ( 1 − s ) m i + s m j ] d s \int_0^1e^{\theta[(1-s)m_i+sm_j]}ds ∫ 0 1 e θ [( 1 − s ) m i + s m j ] d s and is at most their
arithmetic mean by convexity. Summing the coefficients proves (7).
Itô’s formula and (6) now show that
Z u = e − 32 θ 2 u tr ( e θ M u ) Z_u=e^{-32\theta^2u}\operatorname{tr}(e^{\theta M_u}) Z u = e − 32 θ 2 u tr ( e θ M u ) is a nonnegative
local supermartingale, hence a supermartingale. At the first crossing of
λ max ( M u ) ≥ ρ \lambda_{\max}(M_u)\ge\rho λ m a x ( M u ) ≥ ρ before time t t t , its value is at least
e θ ρ − 32 θ 2 t e^{\theta\rho-32\theta^2t} e θρ − 32 θ 2 t . Optional stopping, with Z 0 = n Z_0=n Z 0 = n , gives the
one-sided probability bound n e − θ ρ + 32 θ 2 t n e^{-\theta\rho+32\theta^2t} n e − θρ + 32 θ 2 t .
Optimize at θ = ρ / ( 64 t ) \theta=\rho/(64t) θ = ρ / ( 64 t ) , repeat for − M -M − M , and take the union:
P ( sup u ≤ t ∥ M u ∥ o p ≥ ρ ) ≤ 2 n e − ρ 2 / ( 128 t ) . (8) \mathbb P\left(\sup_{u\le t}\|M_u\|_{\rm op}\ge\rho\right)
\le2n e^{-\rho^2/(128t)}. \tag{8} P ( u ≤ t sup ∥ M u ∥ op ≥ ρ ) ≤ 2 n e − ρ 2 / ( 128 t ) . ( 8 ) The stopped integrand is square integrable by (6), and all optional stopping
arguments can first be made with bounded localizing stops; nonnegativity and
Fatou then pass to the displayed estimates.
On { τ ≤ t } \{\tau\le t\} { τ ≤ t } , continuity gives
M τ = A τ − I + ∫ 0 τ A s 2 d s M_\tau=A_\tau-I+\int_0^\tau A_s^2ds M τ = A τ − I + ∫ 0 τ A s 2 d s .
An upper exit supplies a unit vector with quadratic form at least 1.
A lower exit supplies one with quadratic form at most
− 1 / 2 + 4 t ≤ − 1 / 4 -1/2+4t\le-1/4 − 1/2 + 4 t ≤ − 1/4 . Hence this event implies the event in (8) with ρ = 1 / 4 \rho=1/4 ρ = 1/4 ,
which proves the result.
A transfer for an arbitrary curvature profile ¶ There are universal constants c , C > 0 c,C>0 c , C > 0 such that the following implication holds.
Let F : ( 0 , ∞ ) → ( 0 , ∞ ) F:(0,\infty)\to(0,\infty) F : ( 0 , ∞ ) → ( 0 , ∞ ) satisfy C P ( ν ) ≤ F ( a ) C_P(\nu)\le F(a) C P ( ν ) ≤ F ( a ) , in every
dimension, for every isotropic regular measure ν = e − W d x \nu=e^{-W}dx ν = e − W d x and every
a > 0 a>0 a > 0 such that a I ⪯ D 2 W ⪯ b I aI\preceq D^2W\preceq bI a I ⪯ D 2 W ⪯ b I for some finite b b b .
Then every isotropic log-concave probability measure μ \mu μ on R n \mathbb R^n R n
satisfies
C P ( μ ) ≤ C F ( c / log ( e n ) ) . C_P(\mu)\le C F(c/\log(en)). C P ( μ ) ≤ CF ( c / log ( e n )) . Neither monotonicity nor continuity of F F F is required. This proves
Theorem 7.4 .
First take regular isotropic μ \mu μ and let k = C P ( μ ) k=C_P(\mu) k = C P ( μ ) , finite and positive
by Lemma 7.1 . Choose the witness (2) and form the stopped
Gaussian posteriors above. Put
V t = Var μ t ∧ τ f V_t=\operatorname{Var}_{\mu_{t\wedge\tau}}f V t = Var μ t ∧ τ f and
S ( t ) = E l o c V t S(t)=\mathbb E_{\rm loc}V_t S ( t ) = E loc V t . Applying Itô’s formula to the bounded
martingales E t f \mathbb E_tf E t f and E t f 2 \mathbb E_tf^2 E t f 2 gives
S ( t ) = 1 − ∫ 0 t E l o c [ 1 { s < τ } ∣ Cov μ s ( X , f ) ∣ 2 ] d s . S(t)=1-\int_0^t\mathbb E_{\rm loc}
[\mathbf1_{\{s<\tau\}}|\operatorname{Cov}_{\mu_s}(X,f)|^2]ds. S ( t ) = 1 − ∫ 0 t E loc [ 1 { s < τ } ∣ Cov μ s ( X , f ) ∣ 2 ] d s . Before exit, directional Cauchy--Schwarz yields
∣ Cov μ s ( X , f ) ∣ 2 ≤ ∥ A s ∥ o p V s ≤ 2 V s |\operatorname{Cov}_{\mu_s}(X,f)|^2\le\|A_s\|_{\rm op}V_s\le2V_s ∣ Cov μ s ( X , f ) ∣ 2 ≤ ∥ A s ∥ op V s ≤ 2 V s .
Thus S ′ ( t ) ≥ − 2 S ( t ) S'(t)\ge-2S(t) S ′ ( t ) ≥ − 2 S ( t ) almost everywhere and
S ( t ) ≥ e − 2 t , 0 ≤ V t ≤ B 0 2 . (9) S(t)\ge e^{-2t},\qquad 0\le V_t\le B_0^2. \tag{9} S ( t ) ≥ e − 2 t , 0 ≤ V t ≤ B 0 2 . ( 9 ) The second assertion follows from the global supremum bound of f f f .
Set
c 0 = 1 2048 log ( 16 B 0 2 ) , t = c 0 log ( e n ) . c_0={1\over2048\log(16B_0^2)},\qquad t={c_0\over\log(en)}. c 0 = 2048 log ( 16 B 0 2 ) 1 , t = log ( e n ) c 0 . Then 0 < t < 1 / 16 0<t<1/16 0 < t < 1/16 . With q = 1 / ( 2048 c 0 ) = log ( 16 B 0 2 ) > 1 q=1/(2048c_0)=\log(16B_0^2)>1 q = 1/ ( 2048 c 0 ) = log ( 16 B 0 2 ) > 1 , the exit lemma gives
P ( τ ≤ t ) ≤ 2 n e − 1 / ( 2048 t ) = 2 e − q n 1 − q ≤ 1 8 B 0 2 . \mathbb P(\tau\le t)\le2n e^{-1/(2048t)}
=2e^{-q}n^{1-q}\le{1\over8B_0^2}. P ( τ ≤ t ) ≤ 2 n e − 1/ ( 2048 t ) = 2 e − q n 1 − q ≤ 8 B 0 2 1 . Since e − 2 t ≥ 1 − 2 t ≥ 7 / 8 e^{-2t}\ge1-2t\ge7/8 e − 2 t ≥ 1 − 2 t ≥ 7/8 , subtracting the exit contribution in (9)
gives
E l o c [ 1 { τ > t } Var μ t f ] ≥ 3 / 4 \mathbb E_{\rm loc}[\mathbf1_{\{\tau>t\}}\operatorname{Var}_{\mu_t}f]\ge3/4 E loc [ 1 { τ > t } Var μ t f ] ≥ 3/4 .
There is consequently a realization with τ > t \tau>t τ > t and
Var μ t f > 1 / 2 \operatorname{Var}_{\mu_t}f>1/2 Var μ t f > 1/2 .
Fix it, write m , A m,A m , A for its mean and covariance, and let η \eta η be the law of
A − 1 / 2 ( X − m ) A^{-1/2}(X-m) A − 1/2 ( X − m ) under this posterior. This is regular isotropic and its
potential Hessian is
A 1 / 2 ( D 2 W + t I ) A 1 / 2 ⪰ ( t / 2 ) I . A^{1/2}(D^2W+tI)A^{1/2}\succeq(t/2)I. A 1/2 ( D 2 W + t I ) A 1/2 ⪰ ( t /2 ) I . It also has a finite upper Hessian bound. The transformed witness
z ↦ f ( m + A 1 / 2 z ) z\mapsto f(m+A^{1/2}z) z ↦ f ( m + A 1/2 z ) has variance greater than 1 / 2 1/2 1/2 and gradient energy
at most ∥ A ∥ o p Lip ( f ) 2 ≤ 2 B 0 2 / k \|A\|_{\rm op}\operatorname{Lip}(f)^2\le2B_0^2/k ∥ A ∥ op Lip ( f ) 2 ≤ 2 B 0 2 / k .
The definition of C P ( η ) C_P(\eta) C P ( η ) therefore gives
k ≤ 4 B 0 2 C P ( η ) ≤ 4 B 0 2 F ( t / 2 ) . (10) k\le4B_0^2 C_P(\eta)\le4B_0^2 F(t/2). \tag{10} k ≤ 4 B 0 2 C P ( η ) ≤ 4 B 0 2 F ( t /2 ) . ( 10 ) This uses the hypothesis at the particular admissible lower curvature bound
t / 2 t/2 t /2 ; it never compares values of F F F at nearby arguments.
For arbitrary isotropic log-concave μ \mu μ , choose the regular isotropic
approximation of Lemma 7.1 . The regular-law argument
bounds every approximant by the same number
K = 4 B 0 2 F ( c 0 / ( 2 log ( e n ) ) ) K=4B_0^2F(c_0/(2\log(en))) K = 4 B 0 2 F ( c 0 / ( 2 log ( e n ))) . The isotropic limit is full-dimensional and
absolutely continuous. The scalar stability part of that lemma passes the
inequality to the limit and all locally Lipschitz finite-energy tests.
Taking c = c 0 / 2 c=c_0/2 c = c 0 /2 and C = 4 B 0 2 C=4B_0^2 C = 4 B 0 2 proves the claim. No regularity of F F F enters
this limit either, since its argument is unchanged along the approximants.
All depths, finite stabilization, and affine coordinates ¶ There are universal C , C ′ > 0 C,C'>0 C , C ′ > 0 , independent of r , n r,n r , n , such that every isotropic
log-concave measure μ \mu μ on R n \mathbb R^n R n satisfies, for every integer r ≥ 1 r\ge1 r ≥ 1 ,
C P ( μ ) ≤ C 1 6 r ℓ r ( log ( e n ) ) 2 , Ψ K L S , n ≤ C ′ 4 r ℓ r ( log ( e n ) ) . C_P(\mu)\le C16^r\ell_r(\log(en))^2,
\qquad \Psi_{\mathrm{KLS},n}\le C'4^r\ell_r(\log(en)). C P ( μ ) ≤ C 1 6 r ℓ r ( log ( e n ) ) 2 , Ψ KLS , n ≤ C ′ 4 r ℓ r ( log ( e n )) . In particular C P ( μ ) ≤ C 1 6 log ∗ ( n + 2 ) C_P(\mu)\le C16^{\log^*(n+2)} C P ( μ ) ≤ C 1 6 l o g ∗ ( n + 2 ) and
Ψ K L S , n ≤ C ′ 4 log ∗ ( n + 2 ) \Psi_{\mathrm{KLS},n}\le C'4^{\log^*(n+2)} Ψ KLS , n ≤ C ′ 4 l o g ∗ ( n + 2 ) .
For a log-concave μ \mu μ with positive definite covariance Σ \Sigma Σ , the
Poincaré estimates remain valid after multiplying their right sides by
∥ Σ ∥ o p \|\Sigma\|_{\rm op} ∥Σ ∥ op .
These are Theorem 7.5 and Corollary 7.1 .
For each fixed finite r r r , Theorem 7.3 supplies the profile
F r ( a ) = Γ r 2 ℓ r ( a − 1 ) 2 F_r(a)=\Gamma_r^2\ell_r(a^{-1})^2 F r ( a ) = Γ r 2 ℓ r ( a − 1 ) 2 , with Γ r ≤ C 0 4 r \Gamma_r\le C_0 4^r Γ r ≤ C 0 4 r .
The transfer theorem with its constants just constructed gives
C P ( μ ) ≤ 4 B 0 2 Γ r 2 ℓ r ( ( 2 / c 0 ) log ( e n ) ) 2 . C_P(\mu)\le4B_0^2\Gamma_r^2
\ell_r((2/c_0)\log(en))^2. C P ( μ ) ≤ 4 B 0 2 Γ r 2 ℓ r (( 2/ c 0 ) log ( e n ) ) 2 . The elementary scaling inequality ℓ r ( c x ) ≤ c ℓ r ( x ) \ell_r(cx)\le c\ell_r(x) ℓ r ( c x ) ≤ c ℓ r ( x ) for c ≥ 1 c\ge1 c ≥ 1
was proved in the iteration dossier. Hence this is bounded by
4 B 0 2 ( 2 / c 0 ) 2 C 0 2 1 6 r ℓ r ( log ( e n ) ) 2 . (11) 4B_0^2(2/c_0)^2C_0^2\,16^r\ell_r(\log(en))^2. \tag{11} 4 B 0 2 ( 2/ c 0 ) 2 C 0 2 1 6 r ℓ r ( log ( e n ) ) 2 . ( 11 ) All constants here are independent of both r r r and n n n . By (1),
ψ μ ≤ π C P ( μ ) \psi_\mu\le\sqrt{\pi C_P(\mu)} ψ μ ≤ π C P ( μ ) . Taking the supremum over isotropic laws
in dimension n n n gives the asserted reciprocal-Cheeger estimate.
We now choose a finite depth. For y ≥ 4 y\ge4 y ≥ 4 ,
g ( y + 1 ) = log y + log ( 1 + ( e + 1 ) / y ) ≤ log y + 1 , (12) g(y+1)=\log y+\log(1+(e+1)/y)\le\log y+1, \tag{12} g ( y + 1 ) = log y + log ( 1 + ( e + 1 ) / y ) ≤ log y + 1 , ( 12 ) since e + 1 < 4 e+1<4 e + 1 < 4 and log ( 1 + u ) ≤ u \log(1+u)\le u log ( 1 + u ) ≤ u .
Let x 0 = n + 2 x_0=n+2 x 0 = n + 2 and m m m be the least nonnegative integer for which its m m m th
ordinary logarithmic iterate x m x_m x m is at most 4.
When m ≥ 1 m\ge1 m ≥ 1 , log ( e n ) ≤ 1 + x 1 \log(en)\le1+x_1 log ( e n ) ≤ 1 + x 1 . For 1 ≤ j < m 1\le j<m 1 ≤ j < m we have x j > 4 x_j>4 x j > 4 ,
so (12) inductively yields
ℓ m − 1 ( log ( e n ) ) ≤ 1 + x m ≤ 5 \ell_{m-1}(\log(en))\le1+x_m\le5 ℓ m − 1 ( log ( e n )) ≤ 1 + x m ≤ 5 .
When m = 0 m=0 m = 0 , n + 2 ≤ 4 n+2\le4 n + 2 ≤ 4 and log ( e n ) < 5 \log(en)<5 log ( e n ) < 5 directly.
Also g g g maps [ 0 , 5 ] [0,5] [ 0 , 5 ] into [ 0 , 5 ] [0,5] [ 0 , 5 ] . Therefore
r = max ( 1 , m − 1 ) satisfies ℓ r ( log ( e n ) ) ≤ 5 , r ≤ log ∗ ( n + 2 ) . (13) r=\max(1,m-1)\quad\hbox{satisfies}\quad
\ell_r(\log(en))\le5,\qquad r\le\log^*(n+2). \tag{13} r = max ( 1 , m − 1 ) satisfies ℓ r ( log ( e n )) ≤ 5 , r ≤ log ∗ ( n + 2 ) . ( 13 ) Indeed reaching 4 occurs no later than reaching 1, and
log ∗ ( n + 2 ) ≥ 1 \log^*(n+2)\ge1 log ∗ ( n + 2 ) ≥ 1 for n ≥ 1 n\ge1 n ≥ 1 . Inserting (13) into (11) proves the
1 6 log ∗ 16^{\log^*} 1 6 l o g ∗ bound after absorbing 25 into the universal constant, and the
4 log ∗ 4^{\log^*} 4 l o g ∗ reciprocal-Cheeger bound follows likewise. Each dimension uses
one finite depth; the argument takes no infinite-depth limit.
Finally, let μ \mu μ have mean m m m and positive definite covariance Σ \Sigma Σ ,
and let ρ \rho ρ be the law of Σ − 1 / 2 ( X − m ) \Sigma^{-1/2}(X-m) Σ − 1/2 ( X − m ) , which is isotropic and
log-concave. For a locally Lipschitz finite-energy test f f f , put
h ( y ) = f ( m + Σ 1 / 2 y ) h(y)=f(m+\Sigma^{1/2}y) h ( y ) = f ( m + Σ 1/2 y ) . Then
Var μ f = Var ρ h , ∫ ∣ ∇ h ∣ 2 d ρ = ∫ ∇ f T Σ ∇ f d μ ≤ ∥ Σ ∥ o p ∫ ∣ ∇ f ∣ 2 d μ . \operatorname{Var}_\mu f=\operatorname{Var}_\rho h,
\qquad \int|\nabla h|^2d\rho
=\int\nabla f^T\Sigma\nabla f\,d\mu
\le\|\Sigma\|_{\rm op}\int|\nabla f|^2d\mu. Var μ f = Var ρ h , ∫ ∣∇ h ∣ 2 d ρ = ∫ ∇ f T Σ∇ f d μ ≤ ∥Σ ∥ op ∫ ∣∇ f ∣ 2 d μ . The isotropic inequality, which includes L 2 L^2 L 2 membership of finite-energy
tests, applies to h h h and proves both affine Poincaré estimates.
Dependencies and fences. The generic transfer uses only
Lemma 7.1 , Theorem 25.1 , and the established
bounded-witness and Cheeger comparison from Klartag & Lehec, 2025 . The all-depth result
adds Theorem 7.3 ; its affine corollary only uses the all-depth
result. There are no bounded_by edges on these nodes. These estimates retain
dimension dependence and prove no CMH statement or universal-time occupation
bound. The transfer has a profile hypothesis within its universally quantified
implication; applying it here discharges that hypothesis separately at every
finite depth using the iterated-curvature theorem.
Song, Z., & Zhang, X. (2026). An O(4\log^* n) Bound for the KLS Constant . https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01447v1 Klartag, B., & Lehec, J. (2025). Isoperimetric Inequalities in High-Dimensional Convex Sets. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , 62 (4), 575–642. 10.1090/bull/1869