By (B4),(B13) and M Q ≥ G ( Q ) 2 M_Q\ge G(Q)^2 M Q ≥ G ( Q ) 2 ,
H Q ≤ C M Q H_Q\le CM_Q H Q ≤ C M Q and a Q + s Q + 1 ≤ ( C M Q ) Q a_Q+s_Q+1\le(CM_Q)^Q a Q + s Q + 1 ≤ ( C M Q ) Q .
Set A Q = A M Q A_Q=A M_Q A Q = A M Q , where one sufficiently large universal A A A will be
chosen. At an already established depth r ≥ r Q r\ge r_Q r ≥ r Q suppose
Z Q ≤ Γ r 2 ℓ r ( a − 1 ) 2 Z_Q\le\Gamma_r^2\ell_r(a^{-1})^2 Z Q ≤ Γ r 2 ℓ r ( a − 1 ) 2 , where
Γ r 2 ≥ A Q ( r + 1 ) 1 / Q \Gamma_r^2\ge A_Q(r+1)^{1/Q} Γ r 2 ≥ A Q ( r + 1 ) 1/ Q . The block radius’s static coefficient
bound and the static coefficient transfer give simultaneously
c k 2 ≤ [ Γ ^ 2 ℓ r ( k ) 2 ] k − 1 , c k 2 ≤ g 0 ( k ) k − 1 , Γ ^ = ( 1 + r − 2 ) Γ r . (B26) c_k^2\le[\widehat\Gamma^2\ell_r(k)^2]^{k-1},
\quad c_k^2\le g_0(k)^{k-1},\quad
\widehat\Gamma=(1+r^{-2})\Gamma_r. \tag{B26} c k 2 ≤ [ Γ 2 ℓ r ( k ) 2 ] k − 1 , c k 2 ≤ g 0 ( k ) k − 1 , Γ = ( 1 + r − 2 ) Γ r . ( B26 ) The transfer’s only premise is the previously established scalar profile;
no continuity of Z Q Z_Q Z Q or of its finite defining block length is used.
Put s = r + 1 s=r+1 s = r + 1 , δ = ( 64 Q s ) − 1 \delta=(64Qs)^{-1} δ = ( 64 Q s ) − 1 , p = δ / 128 p=\delta/128 p = δ /128 ,
b = ( 1 − 2 p ) − 1 b=(1-2p)^{-1} b = ( 1 − 2 p ) − 1 , and
k 0 = ⌈ 100 δ − 1 log ( M / δ ) ⌉ k_0=\lceil100\delta^{-1}\log(M/\delta)\rceil k 0 = ⌈ 100 δ − 1 log ( M / δ )⌉ , where a universal
M M M larger than all fixed frame constants is fixed once.
Let d 0 d_0 d 0 be the least dyadic integer at least Q Q Q , and for dyadic
d ≥ d 0 d\ge d_0 d ≥ d 0 suppose for a contradiction that
Z Q > b 4 e δ Γ ^ 2 ℓ r ( d ) 2 . (B27) Z_Q>b^4e^\delta\widehat\Gamma^2\ell_r(d)^2. \tag{B27} Z Q > b 4 e δ Γ 2 ℓ r ( d ) 2 . ( B27 ) Take A A A so large that A Q > 2 H Q A_Q>2H_Q A Q > 2 H Q . Then (B27) excludes the floor:
z = Z Q z=Z_Q z = Z Q is an actual radius with the single family of (B15).
For u = z − 1 u=z^{-1} u = z − 1 ,
b 4 u Γ ^ 2 ℓ r ( d ) 2 < e − δ , u ≤ A Q − 1 s − 1 / Q , u Q ≤ A Q − Q s − 1 . (B28) b^4u\widehat\Gamma^2\ell_r(d)^2<e^{-\delta},
\quad u\le A_Q^{-1}s^{-1/Q},\quad
u^Q\le A_Q^{-Q}s^{-1}. \tag{B28} b 4 u Γ 2 ℓ r ( d ) 2 < e − δ , u ≤ A Q − 1 s − 1/ Q , u Q ≤ A Q − Q s − 1 . ( B28 ) Its retained range covers 2 d 0 − 1 < 4 Q 2d_0-1<4Q 2 d 0 − 1 < 4 Q , and, provided a Q u Q ≤ p a_Qu^Q\le p a Q u Q ≤ p ,
ν ≤ u / ( 1 − a Q u Q ) , P 2 d 0 − 1 ≤ s Q u Q , D 0 : = max ( ν − u , 0 ) ≤ 2 a Q u Q + 1 . \nu\le u/(1-a_Qu^Q),\quad P_{2d_0-1}\le s_Qu^Q,
\quad D_0:=\max(\nu-u,0)\le2a_Qu^{Q+1}. ν ≤ u / ( 1 − a Q u Q ) , P 2 d 0 − 1 ≤ s Q u Q , D 0 := max ( ν − u , 0 ) ≤ 2 a Q u Q + 1 . Before a first exit of mass p p p , required normalizers are at most
B ∗ ≤ u / ( 1 − p ) 2 ≤ b u B_*\le u/(1-p)^2\le bu B ∗ ≤ u / ( 1 − p ) 2 ≤ b u ; hence t ∗ ≤ b t_*\le b t ∗ ≤ b in (B2).
Its loss estimate is bounded by
θ d = C θ ′ ∑ k < d d y a d i c k 8 ( b 4 u ) k c k 2 , Δ d = s Q u Q + 2 C F ∑ d 0 ≤ k < d d y a d i c k 2 ( b u ) k c k 2 , τ d = C F d ( b u ) d c d 2 , (B29) \theta_d=C_\theta'\sum_{k<d\ {\rm dyadic}}k^8(b^4u)^kc_k^2,
\quad \Delta_d=s_Qu^Q+2C_F\sum_{d_0\le k<d\ {\rm dyadic}}
k^2(bu)^kc_k^2,
\quad\tau_d=C_Fd(bu)^dc_d^2, \tag{B29} θ d = C θ ′ k < d dyadic ∑ k 8 ( b 4 u ) k c k 2 , Δ d = s Q u Q + 2 C F d 0 ≤ k < d dyadic ∑ k 2 ( b u ) k c k 2 , τ d = C F d ( b u ) d c d 2 , ( B29 ) where C θ ′ = 5184 C F ⋅ 16 C_\theta'=5184C_F\cdot16 C θ ′ = 5184 C F ⋅ 16 because the block envelope has E = 4 E=4 E = 4 .
Uniform kernel estimates. Since k 0 ≤ C ( Q s ) 2 k_0\le C(Qs)^2 k 0 ≤ C ( Q s ) 2 , (B6) implies
g 0 ( k 0 ) ≤ C g 0 ( Q ) s 1 / Q ≤ Γ r 2 / 4 g_0(k_0)\le Cg_0(Q)s^{1/Q}\le\Gamma_r^2/4 g 0 ( k 0 ) ≤ C g 0 ( Q ) s 1/ Q ≤ Γ r 2 /4 after increasing A A A .
For k ≤ k 0 k\le k_0 k ≤ k 0 , the seed and (B28) give
( b 4 u ) k c k 2 ≤ b 4 u 4 − ( k − 1 ) , ( b u ) k c k 2 ≤ b Q u Q g 0 ( k ) Q − 1 4 − ( k − Q ) ( k ≥ Q ) . (b^4u)^kc_k^2\le b^4u\,4^{-(k-1)},
\quad (bu)^kc_k^2\le b^Qu^Qg_0(k)^{Q-1}4^{-(k-Q)}\ (k\ge Q). ( b 4 u ) k c k 2 ≤ b 4 u 4 − ( k − 1 ) , ( b u ) k c k 2 ≤ b Q u Q g 0 ( k ) Q − 1 4 − ( k − Q ) ( k ≥ Q ) . Therefore the low-degree kernel is at most C u Cu C u , and its low-degree
coherent sum is at most D Q u Q D_Qu^Q D Q u Q , with
D Q 1 / Q ≤ C g 0 ( Q ) D_Q^{1/Q}\le Cg_0(Q) D Q 1/ Q ≤ C g 0 ( Q ) by (B7); use b ≤ 2 b\le2 b ≤ 2 .
For k 0 < k < d k_0<k<d k 0 < k < d , the first bound in (B26) gives
( b 4 u ) k c k 2 ≤ b 4 u e − δ ( k − 1 ) , ( b u ) k c k 2 ≤ e − δ k . (b^4u)^kc_k^2\le b^4u e^{-\delta(k-1)},\qquad
(bu)^kc_k^2\le e^{-\delta k}. ( b 4 u ) k c k 2 ≤ b 4 u e − δ ( k − 1 ) , ( b u ) k c k 2 ≤ e − δ k . For each fixed integer h ≥ 0 h\ge0 h ≥ 0 ,
∑ k > k 0 k h e − δ k ≤ C h δ − h − 1 e − δ k 0 / 2 , e − δ k 0 / 2 ≤ ( δ / M ) 50 . \sum_{k>k_0}k^he^{-\delta k}
\le C_h\delta^{-h-1}e^{-\delta k_0/2},\qquad
e^{-\delta k_0/2}\le(\delta/M)^{50}. k > k 0 ∑ k h e − δ k ≤ C h δ − h − 1 e − δ k 0 /2 , e − δ k 0 /2 ≤ ( δ / M ) 50 . For the first inequality remove half of the exponential and integrate
( x + 1 ) h e − δ x / 2 (x+1)^he^{-\delta x/2} ( x + 1 ) h e − δ x /2 over unit intervals; expansion into monomials
gives C h δ − h − 1 C_h\delta^{-h-1} C h δ − h − 1 . Choosing M M M fixed large makes the two
tail contributions at most u u u and p / 512 p/512 p /512 respectively. Thus
θ d ≤ C θ u , Δ d ≤ ( s Q + D Q ) u Q + p / 512. (B30) \theta_d\le C_\theta u,\qquad
\Delta_d\le(s_Q+D_Q)u^Q+p/512. \tag{B30} θ d ≤ C θ u , Δ d ≤ ( s Q + D Q ) u Q + p /512. ( B30 ) The matched comparison. Choose A A A once so that
A Q ≥ max { 2 H Q , 16 , 16 C θ , C g 0 ( Q ) } , A_Q\ge\max\{2H_Q,16,16C_\theta,Cg_0(Q)\}, A Q ≥ max { 2 H Q , 16 , 16 C θ , C g 0 ( Q )} ,
A Q Q ≥ 2 24 Q ( a Q + s Q + D Q + 4 C θ a Q + 1 ) . (B31) A_Q^Q\ge2^{24}Q(a_Q+s_Q+D_Q+4C_\theta a_Q+1). \tag{B31} A Q Q ≥ 2 24 Q ( a Q + s Q + D Q + 4 C θ a Q + 1 ) . ( B31 ) These simultaneous inequalities are possible with one universal A A A :
every term’s Q Q Q th root is bounded by a constant times M Q M_Q M Q , and
Q 1 / Q Q^{1/Q} Q 1/ Q is uniformly bounded. The block comparison gives
λ ≥ 1 / ( z + 3 ) ≥ u / 2 \lambda\ge1/(z+3)\ge u/2 λ ≥ 1/ ( z + 3 ) ≥ u /2 . Equations (B28)–(B31) imply
ν ≤ 1 / 4 , D 0 ≤ u , a Q u Q ≤ p , θ d u / λ ≤ 1 / 8 , Δ d + θ d D 0 / λ ≤ p / 64 , u + D 0 / p ≤ 2 u . (B32) \nu\le1/4,\quad D_0\le u,\quad a_Qu^Q\le p,
\quad\theta_du/\lambda\le1/8,
\quad\Delta_d+\theta_dD_0/\lambda\le p/64,
\quad u+D_0/p\le2u. \tag{B32} ν ≤ 1/4 , D 0 ≤ u , a Q u Q ≤ p , θ d u / λ ≤ 1/8 , Δ d + θ d D 0 / λ ≤ p /64 , u + D 0 / p ≤ 2 u . ( B32 ) For example θ d D 0 / λ ≤ 4 C θ a Q u Q + 1 \theta_dD_0/\lambda\le4C_\theta a_Qu^{Q+1} θ d D 0 / λ ≤ 4 C θ a Q u Q + 1 and
D 0 / p ≤ 16384 Q a Q A Q − Q u ≤ u D_0/p\le16384Qa_QA_Q^{-Q}u\le u D 0 / p ≤ 16384 Q a Q A Q − Q u ≤ u ; all remaining inequalities
follow by inserting u Q ≤ A Q − Q / s u^Q\le A_Q^{-Q}/s u Q ≤ A Q − Q / s into (B31).
Here is the finite comparison with this matched scale, to make explicit
that no generic R R R -budget is substituted for it. If a delayed bound
P N ≤ Δ + N τ + ( θ / λ ) X max ( N − 2 , 0 ) P_N\le\Delta+N\tau+(\theta/\lambda)X_{\max(N-2,0)} P N ≤ Δ + N τ + ( θ / λ ) X m a x ( N − 2 , 0 )
has p 0 + p 1 ≤ Δ p_0+p_1\le\Delta p 0 + p 1 ≤ Δ and the conditions in (B32), then
a < 12 ( u + D 0 / p ) τ . (B33) a<12(u+D_0/p)\tau. \tag{B33} a < 12 ( u + D 0 / p ) τ . ( B33 ) Indeed the actual matched budget gives
X N − 2 ≤ D 0 + u P N X_{N-2}\le D_0+uP_N X N − 2 ≤ D 0 + u P N and a ≤ D 0 + u ( p 0 + p 1 ) ≤ D 0 + u p a\le D_0+u(p_0+p_1)\le D_0+up a ≤ D 0 + u ( p 0 + p 1 ) ≤ D 0 + u p .
If the reverse of (B33) held, let
m = ⌈ ( D 0 + u p ) / a ⌉ m=\lceil(D_0+up)/a\rceil m = ⌈( D 0 + u p ) / a ⌉ , M 1 = m + 1 M_1=m+1 M 1 = m + 1 ; then
M 1 τ ≤ p / 4 M_1\tau\le p/4 M 1 τ ≤ p /4 .
Before or at a first exiting prefix N ≤ M 1 N\le M_1 N ≤ M 1 all required normalizers
use earlier masses at least 1 − p 1-p 1 − p and so are at most ν / ( 1 − p ) \nu/(1-p) ν / ( 1 − p ) ;
the possible successor remains positive since 1 − p − ν > 0 1-p-\nu>0 1 − p − ν > 0 .
The delayed estimate yields
P N ≤ p / 64 + p / 4 + P N / 8 P_N\le p/64+p/4+P_N/8 P N ≤ p /64 + p /4 + P N /8 , hence P N ≤ c p P_N\le cp P N ≤ c p with c = 17 / 56 < 1 c=17/56<1 c = 17/56 < 1 .
No exit occurs. At time m m m the budget and surviving masses imply
( 1 − c p ) ( D 0 + u p ) ≤ a V m ≤ D 0 + c u p . (1-cp)(D_0+up)\le aV_m\le D_0+cup. ( 1 − c p ) ( D 0 + u p ) ≤ a V m ≤ D 0 + c u p . Their difference is at least u p ( 1 − 2 c − c p ) > 0 up(1-2c-cp)>0 u p ( 1 − 2 c − c p ) > 0 , a contradiction.
This proves (B33). The retained prefix supplies its two initial losses.
Apply it to (B29) to get
a < 24 u τ d ≤ 24 C F d ( b u ) d c d 2 a<24u\tau_d\le24C_Fd(bu)^dc_d^2 a < 24 u τ d ≤ 24 C F d ( b u ) d c d 2 .
For 0 < a ≤ 1 0<a\le1 0 < a ≤ 1 , select a dyadic integer
C T Q 2 s 2 log ( e + a − 1 ) ≤ d < 2 C T Q 2 s 2 log ( e + a − 1 ) . (B34) C_TQ^2s^2\log(e+a^{-1})\le d
<2C_TQ^2s^2\log(e+a^{-1}). \tag{B34} C T Q 2 s 2 log ( e + a − 1 ) ≤ d < 2 C T Q 2 s 2 log ( e + a − 1 ) . ( B34 ) A universal large C T C_T C T ensures d ≥ d 0 d\ge d_0 d ≥ d 0 and
log ( 24 C F d / a ) ≤ δ d \log(24C_Fd/a)\le\delta d log ( 24 C F d / a ) ≤ δ d :
the former logarithm is at most
log ( 48 C F C T ) + 2 log Q + 2 log s + 2 log ( e + a − 1 ) \log(48C_FC_T)+2\log Q+2\log s+2\log(e+a^{-1}) log ( 48 C F C T ) + 2 log Q + 2 log s + 2 log ( e + a − 1 ) ,
whereas δ d ≥ ( C T / 64 ) Q s log ( e + a − 1 ) \delta d\ge(C_T/64)Qs\log(e+a^{-1}) δ d ≥ ( C T /64 ) Q s log ( e + a − 1 ) .
Writing L = Γ ^ 2 ℓ r ( d ) 2 ≥ 1 L=\widehat\Gamma^2\ell_r(d)^2\ge1 L = Γ 2 ℓ r ( d ) 2 ≥ 1 , (B26),(B28) would give
a < 24 C F d L − 1 ( b u L ) d ≤ 24 C F d e − δ d ≤ a . a<24C_FdL^{-1}(buL)^d\le24C_Fd e^{-\delta d}\le a. a < 24 C F d L − 1 ( b uL ) d ≤ 24 C F d e − δ d ≤ a . Thus (B27) is impossible. For a ≥ 1 a\ge1 a ≥ 1 , Brascamp–Lieb gives
C P ≤ 1 C_P\le1 C P ≤ 1 and Z Q ≤ H Q Z_Q\le H_Q Z Q ≤ H Q , already covered by the same large amplitude.
Closing all depths. The distortion lemma now implies
Z Q ≤ b 4 e δ ( 1 + r − 2 ) 2 Γ r 2 ζ r 2 ℓ r + 1 ( a − 1 ) 2 . Z_Q\le b^4e^\delta(1+r^{-2})^2\Gamma_r^2
\zeta_r^2\ell_{r+1}(a^{-1})^2. Z Q ≤ b 4 e δ ( 1 + r − 2 ) 2 Γ r 2 ζ r 2 ℓ r + 1 ( a − 1 ) 2 . Since
log ( b 4 e δ ) ≤ 16 p + δ = 9 / ( 512 Q s ) ≤ Q − 1 log ( 1 + 1 / s ) \log(b^4e^\delta)\le16p+\delta=9/(512Qs)
\le Q^{-1}\log(1+1/s) log ( b 4 e δ ) ≤ 16 p + δ = 9/ ( 512 Q s ) ≤ Q − 1 log ( 1 + 1/ s ) , define
J r Q = 1 , J r + 1 = J r ( 1 + r − 2 ) 2 ζ r 2 , Γ r 2 = A Q ( r + 1 ) 1 / Q J r . J_{r_Q}=1,\quad J_{r+1}=J_r(1+r^{-2})^2\zeta_r^2,
\quad\Gamma_r^2=A_Q(r+1)^{1/Q}J_r. J r Q = 1 , J r + 1 = J r ( 1 + r − 2 ) 2 ζ r 2 , Γ r 2 = A Q ( r + 1 ) 1/ Q J r . All J r J_r J r are universally bounded. The initial bound follows from
Z Q ≤ max ( H Q , C P ) Z_Q\le\max(H_Q,C_P) Z Q ≤ max ( H Q , C P ) and (B24) by increasing the same universal A A A .
Finite induction gives the first inequality in (B25), with its
coefficient transfer at each step justified by the previous profile.
Finally C P ≤ Z Q + 3 C_P\le Z_Q+3 C P ≤ Z Q + 3 and M Q , ℓ r ≥ 1 M_Q,\ell_r\ge1 M Q , ℓ r ≥ 1 absorb the additive
constant once, proving the second inequality.