Part of the second version of Song–Zhang, Chapter Song–Zhang, second version: repeated refinement with summable losses; the reading order is on the full proofs page.
Overview. This dossier composes Theorem 9.3 with the unchanged canonical target Conjecture 0.1. The only domain adjustment is to interpret the Poincaré inequality for locally Lipschitz functions whose Dirichlet integral is infinite. The Cheeger formulation then follows from the established two-sided comparison.
Dependencies. The only theorem input is Theorem 9.3. For the equivalent Cheeger formulation we use (0.3), with the normalization and references recorded there Klartag, 2023Milman, 2009. There is no BKL premise, no consequence of BKL, and no invocation of the already recorded status of Conjecture 0.1. The upstream Song–Zhang reconstruction supplies its own universal Poincaré theorem. This composition does not certify that upstream theorem or substitute for its independent review.
Fences respected. This composition claims only a universal constant. It establishes no sharper structural inequality and does not discharge any unrelated conditional premise. Its proof uses the Song–Zhang theorem and the earlier Cheeger comparison, rather than the other proof record attached to the same target.
- Klartag, B. (2023). Logarithmic Bounds for Isoperimetry and Slices of Convex Sets. Ars Inveniendi Analytica, 2023(4), 1–17. 10.15781/jsjy-0b06
- Milman, E. (2009). On the Role of Convexity in Isoperimetry, Spectral Gap and Concentration. Inventiones Mathematicae, 177(1), 1–43. 10.1007/s00222-009-0175-9