Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Approximation closure for the moment-Hessian constant

Part of the moment-map mechanism, Chapter The moment map: the deterministic inequality; the reading order is on the full proofs page.

Overview. This dossier answers Proposition 15.1 (Theorem D27.1). Every centered log-concave law, including one carried by a proper affine subspace, is a W2\Wtwo-limit of explicit regular compact-target approximants μk\mu_k with CPaff(μ)≤lim inf⁡kCPaff(μk)≤lim inf⁡kCCMH(μk)\CPaff(\mu)\le\liminf_k\CPaff(\mu_k)\le\liminf_k\CMH(\mu_k) ((D27.5)). A uniform CMH bound on these approximants ((D27.6)) therefore gives the affine Poincaré inequality for μ\mu with the same constant. That uniform bound is an explicit hypothesis: no universal CMH(4)\mathrm{CMH}(4), no KLS and no continuity of CCMH\CMH is claimed. Only the Poincaré inequality is passed to the limit, never the Stein kernels.

  1. Gaussian smoothing, a quadratic tilt, restriction to a ball and centering give μk\mu_k with W2(μk,μ)<2/k+n/k2\Wtwo(\mu_k,\mu)<2/k+\sqrt n/k^2 ((D27.15)). Their potentials are smooth and strictly convex ((D27.18)).

  2. Theorem 4.1 and Fathi’s Stein theorem supply the kernel HkH_k with EμkHk=Σk\E_{\mu_k}H_k=\Sigma_k ((D27.22)). The Stein form on the ambient core is closable with constant kernel (Lemma D27.1), so Theorem 16.1 gives (D27.28).

  3. At a singular limit, the intrinsic covariance form on S=Ran⁡ΣS=\operatorname{Ran}\Sigma is closable and R+Cc∞(S)\R+C_c^\infty(S) is a dense core. It agrees with the ambient core because Σ\Sigma and Σ+\Sigma^+ annihilate normal derivatives ((D27.32)).

  4. Convergence of the covariances, variances and energies on the common core ((D27.33)–(D27.35)) with the density of step 3 gives the lower semicontinuity of CPaff\CPaff. Combined with step 2 this gives (D27.5).

  5. Any whitening is applied only to individual approximants and undone before the limit, since whitening diverges in collapsing directions ((D27.38)).

Scope. This dossier answers Proposition 15.1 with the closed-form convention already used by Definition 16.1 and Theorem 16.1. It constructs regular compact-target approximants of every centered log-concave law, including a law carried by a proper affine subspace, and proves that a uniform CMH estimate on those approximants passes to the affine Poincaré inequality with no loss. The uniform CMH estimate is an explicit hypothesis: nothing below proves universal CMH(4)\mathrm{CMH}(4) or Conjecture 0.1, and no continuity of CCMH\CMH is asserted.

1. Statement and the limiting closed form

Let μ\mu be a centered log-concave probability measure on Rn\R^n, let Σ=Cov⁡(μ)\Sigma=\Cov(\mu), and put

S=Ran⁡Σ,d=dim⁡S,ΣS=Σ∣S.S=\operatorname{Ran}\Sigma, \qquad d=\dim S, \qquad \Sigma_S=\Sigma|_S.

The affine hull of μ\mu is SS. Indeed, if v∈ker⁡Σv\in\ker\Sigma, then Var⁡μ⟨v,X⟩=0\Var_\mu\inner{v}{X}=0 and centeredness gives ⟨v,X⟩=0\inner{v}{X}=0 almost surely, so the affine hull is contained in (ker⁡Σ)⊥=Ran⁡Σ(\ker\Sigma)^\perp=\operatorname{Ran}\Sigma. Conversely, the covariance is positive definite on the affine hull: otherwise the support would lie in a proper affine hyperplane of its own affine hull. Thus ΣS≻0\Sigma_S\succ0 when d>0d>0.

For d>0d>0, start on the globally Lipschitz functions f:S→Rf:S\to\R that belong to L2(μ)L^2(\mu) with the covariance pre-form

EΣ,μ0(f)=∫S⟨ΣS∇Sf,∇Sf⟩  dμ.\calE_{\Sigma,\mu}^{0}(f) =\int_S\inner{\Sigma_S\nabla_S f}{\nabla_S f}\,\dd\mu.

Its closed relaxation in L2(μ)L^2(\mu) is denoted by EΣ,μ\calE_{\Sigma,\mu}, and its domain by HΣ1(μ)H^1_\Sigma(\mu). This is the intrinsic convention throughout the dossier; no equality with a separately defined maximal distributional or Neumann Sobolev domain is claimed. Section 4 below proves both closability and density of

CS=R+Cc∞(S)\mathscr C_S=\R+C_c^\infty(S)

in this domain. Define

CPaff(μ)=sup⁡f∈HΣ1(μ)∖RVar⁡μfEΣ,μ(f).\CPaff(\mu) =\sup_{f\in H^1_\Sigma(\mu)\setminus\R} \frac{\Var_\mu f}{\calE_{\Sigma,\mu}(f)}.

If d=0d=0, then μ=δ0\mu=\delta_0; by convention HΣ1(μ)=L2(μ)=RH^1_\Sigma(\mu)=L^2(\mu)=\R and CPaff(μ)=0\CPaff(\mu)=0.

2. Construction of regular compact-target approximants

Let X∼μX\sim\mu and let G∼N(0,In)G\sim N(0,I_n) be independent. For δ>0\delta>0 write

λδ=L(X+δG),qδ= dλδ dx.\lambda_\delta=\mathcal L(X+\sqrt\delta G), \qquad q_\delta=\frac{\dd\lambda_\delta}{\dd x}.

The density qδq_\delta is positive and C∞C^\infty on Rn\R^n. It is log-concave by the Prékopa theorem (equivalently, convolution preserves log-concavity). Moreover

W22(λδ,μ)≤nδ,∫x  dλδ(x)=0,Cov⁡(λδ)=Σ+δIn.\Wtwo^2(\lambda_\delta,\mu)\le n\delta, \qquad \int x\,\dd\lambda_\delta(x)=0, \qquad \Cov(\lambda_\delta)=\Sigma+\delta I_n.

For δ,ε>0\delta,\eps>0 and R<∞R<\infty, define

Zδ,ε,R=∫B(0,R)qδ(x)e−ε∣x∣2/2  dx, dμ~δ,ε,R(x)=Zδ,ε,R−11B(0,R)(x)qδ(x)e−ε∣x∣2/2  dx.Z_{\delta,\eps,R} =\int_{B(0,R)}q_\delta(x)e^{-\eps|x|^2/2}\,\dd x, \qquad \dd\widetilde\mu_{\delta,\eps,R}(x) =Z_{\delta,\eps,R}^{-1}\one_{B(0,R)}(x) q_\delta(x)e^{-\eps|x|^2/2}\,\dd x.

Let mδ,ε,Rm_{\delta,\eps,R} be its mean and center it:

μδ,ε,R=(x↦x−mδ,ε,R)#μ~δ,ε,R.\mu_{\delta,\eps,R} =(x\mapsto x-m_{\delta,\eps,R})_\# \widetilde\mu_{\delta,\eps,R}.

For fixed δ\delta, as ε↓0\eps\downarrow0 and R↑∞R\uparrow\infty, the density ratio in (D27.10) converges pointwise to one relative to λδ\lambda_\delta and is bounded above by 1/Zδ,ε,R1/Z_{\delta,\eps,R}, with Zδ,ε,R→1Z_{\delta,\eps,R}\to1. Dominated convergence therefore gives weak convergence to λδ\lambda_\delta and convergence of the second moment: for the latter, apply it to ∣x∣21B(0,R)e−ε∣x∣2/2|x|^2\one_{B(0,R)}e^{-\eps|x|^2/2}, dominated by the λδ\lambda_\delta-integrable function ∣x∣2|x|^2. The weak-plus-second-moment characterization of quadratic Wasserstein convergence gives

W2(μ~δ,ε,R,λδ)⟶0.\Wtwo(\widetilde\mu_{\delta,\eps,R},\lambda_\delta)\longrightarrow0.

Here is an explicit diagonal choice. Set δk=k−4\delta_k=k^{-4}. By (D27.12), choose

0<εk<k−1,Rk>k,W2(μ~δk,εk,Rk,λδk)<k−1,0<\eps_k<k^{-1}, \qquad R_k>k, \qquad \Wtwo(\widetilde\mu_{\delta_k,\eps_k,R_k},\lambda_{\delta_k})<k^{-1},

and put mk=mδk,εk,Rkm_k=m_{\delta_k,\eps_k,R_k} and μk=μδk,εk,Rk\mu_k=\mu_{\delta_k,\eps_k,R_k}. Since λδk\lambda_{\delta_k} is centered, comparison of means under any coupling gives

∣mk∣≤W2(μ~δk,εk,Rk,λδk)<k−1.|m_k| \le \Wtwo(\widetilde\mu_{\delta_k,\eps_k,R_k},\lambda_{\delta_k})<k^{-1}.

Translation by −mk-m_k, the triangle inequality, and (D27.9) now yield the quantitative diagonal estimate

W2(μk,μ)≤∣mk∣+W2(μ~δk,εk,Rk,λδk)+W2(λδk,μ)<2k+nk2.\Wtwo(\mu_k,\mu) \le |m_k| +\Wtwo(\widetilde\mu_{\delta_k,\eps_k,R_k},\lambda_{\delta_k}) +\Wtwo(\lambda_{\delta_k},\mu) <\frac2k+\frac{\sqrt n}{k^2}.

No whitening has been used.

We next check every target hypothesis. The support of μk\mu_k is the convex body

Pk=B(−mk,Rk),P_k=B(-m_k,R_k),

and, on its interior,

 dμk(z)=gk(z)  dz,gk(z)=Zδk,εk,Rk−1qδk(z+mk)e−εk∣z+mk∣2/2.\dd\mu_k(z)=g_k(z)\,\dd z, \qquad g_k(z)=Z_{\delta_k,\eps_k,R_k}^{-1} q_{\delta_k}(z+m_k)e^{-\eps_k|z+m_k|^2/2}.

The function gkg_k extends to a positive C∞C^\infty function on all of Rn\R^n. The measure is centered by construction and full-dimensional because gk>0g_k>0 on the nonempty open ball int⁡Pk\operatorname{int}P_k. In particular, its covariance Σk\Sigma_k is positive definite. Also 0∈int⁡Pk0\in\operatorname{int}P_k: the barycenter of a positive density on a full-dimensional convex body cannot lie on a supporting hyperplane of that body.

Writing Vk=−log⁡gkV_k=-\log g_k on int⁡Pk\operatorname{int}P_k, log-concavity of qδkq_{\delta_k} gives

D2Vk(z)=D2(−log⁡qδk)(z+mk)+εkIn⪰εkIn.D^2V_k(z) =D^2(-\log q_{\delta_k})(z+m_k)+\eps_k I_n \succeq \eps_k I_n.

Thus μk\mu_k is log-concave, and its interior potential is smooth and strictly convex. (The additional standard convolution identity gives D2(−log⁡qδk)⪯δk−1InD^2(-\log q_{\delta_k})\preceq\delta_k^{-1}I_n, but no uniform Hessian bound is used.)

The published compact-target regularity theorem Berman & Berndtsson, 2013, in the repository form of Theorem 4.1, now applies to the centered probability gk1int⁡Pk  dxg_k\one_{\operatorname{int}P_k}\,\dd x. It supplies a smooth strictly convex canonical moment potential φk\varphi_k on Rn\R^n and a global diffeomorphism

∇φk:Rn⟶int⁡Pk.\nabla\varphi_k:\R^n\longrightarrow\operatorname{int}P_k.

With target coordinate x=∇φk(y)x=\nabla\varphi_k(y), define

Hk(x)=D2φk((∇φk)−1(x)).H_k(x)=D^2\varphi_k((\nabla\varphi_k)^{-1}(x)).

Fathi’s moment-map Stein theorem Fathi, 2019 gives a smooth positive symmetric field on int⁡Pk\operatorname{int}P_k satisfying, for every scalar ambient test F∈Cc∞(Rn)F\in C_c^\infty(\R^n),

∫xiF(x)  dμk(x)=∫(Hk)ij(x)∂jF(x)  dμk(x).\int x_iF(x)\,\dd\mu_k(x) =\int (H_k)_{ij}(x)\partial_jF(x)\,\dd\mu_k(x).

Equivalently, Div⁡μkHk=−x\operatorname{Div}_{\mu_k}H_k=-x distributionally on the ambient space. The absence of a boundary distribution in (D27.21) is precisely the weak zero-normal-flux convention used by the certified endpoint. Since PkP_k is bounded, testing with a cutoff that equals the coordinate function xjx_j near PkP_k gives

EμkHk=Eμk[X⊗X]=Σk.\E_{\mu_k}H_k=\E_{\mu_k}[X\otimes X]=\Sigma_k.

Thus every hypothesis of the imported regular moment-map input has been matched.

3. The exact closed Stein form on each approximant

For fixed kk, let

Dk={F∣Pk:F∈R+Cc∞(Rn)}\mathscr D_k =\{F|_{P_k}:F\in\R+C_c^\infty(\R^n)\}

and define on this ambient restriction core

EHk0(f,g)=∫Pk⟨Hk∇f,∇g⟩  dμk.\calE_{H_k}^0(f,g) =\int_{P_k}\inner{H_k\nabla f}{\nabla g}\,\dd\mu_k.

The value is independent of the ambient extension, because two smooth extensions agreeing on the open set int⁡Pk\operatorname{int}P_k have the same gradient there. The core is dense in L2(μk)L^2(\mu_k), and (D27.22) shows that every core function has finite energy:

EHk0(f,f)≤∥∇f∥∞2∫Tr⁡Hk  dμk=∥∇f∥∞2Tr⁡Σk<∞.\calE_{H_k}^0(f,f) \le\norm{\nabla f}_\infty^2\int\Tr H_k\,\dd\mu_k =\norm{\nabla f}_\infty^2\Tr\Sigma_k<\infty.

The weak Stein identity gives, on smooth tests for which the displayed quantities are integrable,

Div⁡μk(Hk∇g)=Tr⁡(HkD2g)−x⋅∇g,−∫fLμkg  dμk=EHk0(f,g).\operatorname{Div}_{\mu_k}(H_k\nabla g) =\Tr(H_kD^2g)-x\cdot\nabla g, \qquad -\int fL_{\mu_k}g\,\dd\mu_k=\calE_{H_k}^0(f,g).

Thus the Friedrichs form operator in Lemma D27.1 is exactly the closed-form object used by Definition 16.1; its inverse is understood only on the orthogonal complement of its constant kernel. We do not identify this domain with an unnamed maximal Neumann or maximal distributional domain.

Theorem 16.1 is therefore applicable to every μk\mu_k and gives

CPaff(μk)≤CCMH(μk).\CPaff(\mu_k)\le\CMH(\mu_k).

This is the only step at which the CMH quantity is used.

4. The intrinsic domain at a singular limit

A log-concave probability whose affine hull is SS has a density with respect to dd-dimensional Lebesgue measure on SS; that density is positive and locally bounded above and below on the relative interior of its convex support. Consequently the same local distributional-derivative argument as in Lemma D27.1, now with the constant positive matrix ΣS\Sigma_S, proves that the pre-form (D27.2) is closable. It also shows that the kernel of its closure consists of the constants, because the relative interior of a convex support is connected.

We now prove the promised core density rather than assume it. It is enough to approximate a globally Lipschitz f∈L2(μ)f\in L^2(\mu) in the form norm.

(1) Let TMf=(−M)∨f∧MT_Mf=(-M)\vee f\wedge M. The Lipschitz chain rule and dominated convergence give TMf→fT_Mf\to f in L2(μ)L^2(\mu) and EΣ,μ0(TMf−f)→0\calE_{\Sigma,\mu}^0(T_Mf-f)\to0.

(2) For bounded ff, choose χR∈Cc∞(S)\chi_R\in C_c^\infty(S) equal to one on BS(0,R)B_S(0,R), supported in BS(0,2R)B_S(0,2R), with ∣∇SχR∣≤c/R|\nabla_S\chi_R|\le c/R. Then χRf→f\chi_Rf\to f in L2(μ)L^2(\mu) and in energy. Indeed, the tail part containing (1−χR)∇Sf(1-\chi_R)\nabla_Sf tends to zero by dominated convergence, while

∫f2⟨ΣS∇SχR,∇SχR⟩  dμ≤∥f∥∞2∥ΣS∥opc2R−2⟶0.\int f^2\inner{\Sigma_S\nabla_S\chi_R}{\nabla_S\chi_R}\,\dd\mu \le \norm{f}_\infty^2\norm{\Sigma_S}_\op c^2R^{-2}\longrightarrow0.

(3) A compactly supported Lipschitz function on the Euclidean space SS can be mollified inside SS. The mollifications converge uniformly in value, their gradients converge Lebesgue-almost everywhere, and their gradients are uniformly bounded by the original Lipschitz constant. Since μ\mu is absolutely continuous on SS, dominated convergence gives convergence in both L2(μ)L^2(\mu) and the covariance energy.

The resulting functions belong to Cc∞(S)C_c^\infty(S), proving that CS\mathscr C_S is dense in HΣ1(μ)H^1_\Sigma(\mu). When d=0d=0, the intrinsic space is the singleton space and this statement reduces to density of the constants.

This intrinsic core is exactly the restriction of the one common ambient core

C=R+Cc∞(Rn).\mathscr C=\R+C_c^\infty(\R^n).

Indeed, an ambient test restricts to an element of CS\mathscr C_S. Conversely, in the orthogonal splitting x=s+t∈S⊕S⊥x=s+t\in S\oplus S^\perp, extend ϕ∈Cc∞(S)\phi\in C_c^\infty(S) by

F(s+t)=ϕ(s)η(t),F(s+t)=\phi(s)\eta(t),

where η∈Cc∞(S⊥)\eta\in C_c^\infty(S^\perp) equals one near 0. Then F∈Cc∞(Rn)F\in C_c^\infty(\R^n), F∣S=ϕF|_S=\phi, and its normal derivative vanishes on SS.

More generally, if two ambient extensions agree on SS, their tangential gradients agree and the difference of their ambient gradients lies in S⊥S^\perp. With PSP_S denoting orthogonal projection,

Σ=PSΣSPS,Σ+=PSΣS−1PS,ΣPS⊥=Σ+PS⊥=0.\Sigma=P_S\Sigma_SP_S, \qquad \Sigma^+=P_S\Sigma_S^{-1}P_S, \qquad \Sigma P_{S^\perp}=\Sigma^+P_{S^\perp}=0.

Hence ambient restriction and intrinsic evaluation agree in the covariance energy, and both Σ\Sigma and its Moore–Penrose inverse annihilate every normal derivative. This is exactly the affine-tangent convention in Definition 16.1; no inverse is taken in a collapsing normal direction.

5. Constant-preserving lower semicontinuity

Quadratic Wasserstein convergence in (D27.15) implies weak convergence together with convergence of second moments. Since all measures are centered,

Σk=∫xx⊤  dμk(x)⟶∫xx⊤  dμ(x)=Σ\Sigma_k=\int xx^\top\,\dd\mu_k(x) \longrightarrow \int xx^\top\,\dd\mu(x)=\Sigma

in every matrix norm (apply second-moment uniform integrability to each entry, or use polarization).

Fix one F∈CF\in\mathscr C. Both FF and F2F^2 are bounded and continuous, so

Var⁡μkF⟶Var⁡μF.\Var_{\mu_k}F\longrightarrow\Var_\mu F.

For the energies, set h(x)=⟨Σ∇F(x),∇F(x)⟩h(x)=\inner{\Sigma\nabla F(x)}{\nabla F(x)}, a bounded continuous function. Then

∣∫⟨Σk∇F,∇F⟩  dμk−∫⟨Σ∇F,∇F⟩  dμ∣≤∥Σk−Σ∥op∥∇F∥∞2+∣∫h  dμk−∫h  dμ∣⟶0.\begin{aligned} &\left|\int\inner{\Sigma_k\nabla F}{\nabla F}\,\dd\mu_k -\int\inner{\Sigma\nabla F}{\nabla F}\,\dd\mu\right| \\ &\quad\le \norm{\Sigma_k-\Sigma}_\op\norm{\nabla F}_\infty^2 +\left|\int h\,\dd\mu_k-\int h\,\dd\mu\right| \longrightarrow0. \end{aligned}

Let L=lim inf⁡kCPaff(μk)L=\liminf_k\CPaff(\mu_k) and select a subsequence along which the constants converge to LL. If L=∞L=\infty there is nothing to prove. Otherwise, the affine Poincaré inequality on each approximant, followed by (D27.34)– (D27.35), gives on the common core

Var⁡μF≤L∫⟨Σ∇F,∇F⟩  dμ.\Var_\mu F \le L\int\inner{\Sigma\nabla F}{\nabla F}\,\dd\mu.

Restricting to SS and using the core density proved in Section 4 extends the inequality to every f∈HΣ1(μ)f\in H^1_\Sigma(\mu). Therefore

CPaff(μ)≤lim inf⁡kCPaff(μk).\CPaff(\mu)\le\liminf_k\CPaff(\mu_k).

Combining this with the pointwise certified endpoint (D27.28) proves (D27.5). In particular, (D27.6) yields CPaff(μ)≤C\CPaff(\mu)\le C with no change of constant. Notice that the argument passes only the Poincaré/Dirichlet-form inequality. It uses neither convergence of HkH_k nor lower semicontinuity of CCMH\CMH.

6. Eigenvalues, whitening, and affine-support collapse

Order covariance eigenvalues decreasingly. If λ1(Σ)≥⋯≥λd(Σ)>0\lambda_1(\Sigma)\ge\cdots\ge\lambda_d(\Sigma)>0 are the positive eigenvalues, followed by n−dn-d zeros, then (D27.33) and Weyl’s inequality give

λi(Σk)⟶λi(Σ)>0(1≤i≤d),λi(Σk)⟶0(d<i≤n).\lambda_i(\Sigma_k)\longrightarrow\lambda_i(\Sigma)>0 \quad(1\le i\le d), \qquad \lambda_i(\Sigma_k)\longrightarrow0 \quad(d<i\le n).

Every Σk\Sigma_k is positive definite, so each approximant may be whitened by the invertible map Ak=Σk−1/2A_k=\Sigma_k^{-1/2}. Invertible affine covariance of both CCMH\CMH and CPaff\CPaff allows one to apply the regular endpoint in those isotropic coordinates and then pull its inequality back to μk\mu_k.

When d<nd<n, however, (D27.38) shows that AkA_k diverges in the collapsing normal directions. The whitened laws all have covariance InI_n and therefore cannot converge in W2\Wtwo to a law with covariance Σ\Sigma singular. The valid order is:

(1) whiten an individual full-dimensional approximant if desired;

(2) use invertible affine covariance to unwhiten its Poincaré inequality;

(3) take the W2\Wtwo limit in the original coordinates using (D27.35).

No canonical moment-map kernel is pushed through a noninvertible limiting map. At the limit, only the intrinsic covariance form on S=Ran⁡ΣS=\operatorname{Ran}\Sigma remains, with normal directions removed by (D27.32).

Obstructions respected. The ledger gives prop:cmh-approximation-closure no bounded_by edge. The argument also does not enter the fixed-cut obstruction regime: it uses no tail split, projection-only test, localization occupation estimate, relative trace upgrade, evolving isoperimetric competitor, or rank-one product-cut assertion. In particular, affine-support collapse is handled at the Poincaré form level rather than by transporting a canonical Stein kernel through a noninvertible map.

Conditional status and exclusions. The approximation sequence exists unconditionally, and the closure theorem is analytic. The only unresolved premise in the route implication is (D27.6). Thus this dossier can at most certify the conditional node “uniform CMH on the constructed regular approximants implies the affine Poincaré inequality for the limit.” CMH is used only as a sufficient condition. No converse, no universal CMH(4)\mathrm{CMH}(4) estimate, and no proof of KLS appears here.

References
  1. Berman, R. J., & Berndtsson, B. (2013). Real Monge–Ampère Equations and Kähler–Ricci Solitons on Toric Log Fano Varieties. Annales de La Faculté Des Sciences de Toulouse. Mathématiques, 22(4), 649–711. 10.5802/afst.1386
  2. Fathi, M. (2019). Stein Kernels and Moment Maps. The Annals of Probability, 47(4), 2172–2185. 10.1214/18-AOP1305