Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

The posterior eigenfunction defect

Part of the fixed-eigenfunction mechanism, Chapter The fixed eigenfunction: following one eigenfunction through localization; the reading order is on the full proofs page.

Overview. This dossier proves Lemma 21.1 as Theorem D14.1. The setting is a smooth, strongly log-concave, isotropic law, a normalized first eigenfunction ff, and the planted Gaussian observation channel. The posterior defect RtR_t obeys three exact integration-by-parts identities (D14.7), two variance budgets (D14.8) and an averaged gradient bound (D14.9). The identities come from pairing a posterior generator relation with constant, linear and quadratic tests. The budgets come from filtering martingales and the planted cancellation Rt(X)=Btobs⋅∇f(X)R_t(X)=B_t^{\mathrm{obs}}\cdot\nabla f(X). The imported node Theorem 25.1 is not used.

  1. The posterior density (D14.10) and the innovation Brownian motion give the filtering equation (D14.13). The posterior generator is (D14.16), with its domains justified by cutoffs and stopping.

  2. The generator relation (D14.17) is paired with constants, coordinates and centered quadratics QDQ_D. This gives the three identities (D14.7).

  3. The planted cancellation (D14.22) gives EEtRt2=tλ\E\E_tR_t^2=t\lambda ((D14.24)). Combined with the Itô isometry for mtm_t and the first identity of step 2, this yields the centered-defect budget.

  4. Filtering applied to ∇f\nabla f gives the isometry (D14.28). Conditional Jensen, together with b0=λg0b_0=\lambda g_0 from step 2, bounds the CtC_t budget.

  5. The gradient of RtR_t is evaluated at the planted point ((D14.30)). The weighted Bochner identity and convexity bound Eμ∥∇2f∥HS2≤λ2\E_\mu\norm{\nabla^2f}_{\HS}^2\le\lambda^2, which proves (D14.9).

Refined statement. The regular setting in the following theorem makes explicit the domain and normalization conventions implicit in Lemma 21.1. For vectors v,w∈Rnv,w\in\R^n we use (v⊗w)ij=viwj(v\otimes w)_{ij}=v_iw_j, and sym⁡M=(M+MT)/2\operatorname{sym}M=(M+M^T)/2.

Obstructions respected. The ledger node has no formal bounded_by edge. The route fences were nevertheless checked individually. The proof uses no cut or slice estimate, so rem:two-tail-slice-bounds, rem:profile-circularity, and rem:single-coordinate-cuts are not engaged. It derives exact coordinate and full symmetric-matrix integration-by-parts identities rather than a dimension-free quadratic-chaos theorem from radial or projection tests, so it does not cross rem:projection-ceiling. It uses neither the crude covariance integral nor a relative covariance occupation bound, respecting rem:crude-insufficient and rem:relative-ceiling. Finally, it never bounds a posterior covariance operator norm, never unwhitens a tensor, and never invokes the refuted truncated-exponential variable-weight Stein shortcut; hence it also respects the covariance-spike and spectral-unwhitening warnings. The transport and needle warnings are inapplicable because neither mechanism occurs.