Posterior equations and curvature bounds. Conditional on X = x X=x X = x , the observation likelihood up to time t t t is proportional to exp ( c t ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 / 2 ) \exp(c_t\cdot x-t\abs{x}^2/2) exp ( c t ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 /2 ) . Hence
d μ t ( x ) = exp ( c t ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 / 2 ) ∫ exp ( c t ⋅ y − t ∣ y ∣ 2 / 2 ) d μ ( y ) d μ ( x ) . \dd\mu_t(x)
=\frac{\exp(c_t\cdot x-t\abs{x}^2/2)}
{\int\exp(c_t\cdot y-t\abs{y}^2/2)\dd\mu(y)}\,\dd\mu(x). d μ t ( x ) = ∫ exp ( c t ⋅ y − t ∣ y ∣ 2 /2 ) d μ ( y ) exp ( c t ⋅ x − t ∣ x ∣ 2 /2 ) d μ ( x ) . The innovation process
W t = c t − ∫ 0 t a s d s W_t=c_t-\int_0^ta_s\dd s W t = c t − ∫ 0 t a s d s is an n n n -dimensional Brownian motion in the observation filtration, and the filtering identity for a fixed integrable test ϕ \phi ϕ is
d E t ϕ = Cov μ t ( ϕ , X ) ⋅ d W t , \dd\E_t\phi=\Cov_{\mu_t}(\phi,X)\cdot\dd W_t, d E t ϕ = Cov μ t ( ϕ , X ) ⋅ d W t , first for bounded tests and then, in the square-integrable cases used below, by L 2 L^2 L 2 closure.
The posterior potential in (D18.8) has Hessian ∇ 2 V + t I n ⪰ ( κ + t ) I n \nabla^2V+tI_n\succeq(\kappa+t)I_n ∇ 2 V + t I n ⪰ ( κ + t ) I n . Brascamp–Lieb applied to linear functions therefore gives, with w t = κ + t w_t=\kappa+t w t = κ + t ,
w t A t ⪯ I n . w_tA_t\preceq I_n. w t A t ⪯ I n . When w t = 0 w_t=0 w t = 0 , this is read as the trivial positive-semidefinite inequality. Consequently
R t : = ∣ g t ∣ 2 − w t g t T A t g t = g t T ( I n − w t A t ) g t ≥ 0. \mathcal R_t:=\abs{g_t}^2-w_tg_t^TA_tg_t
=g_t^T(I_n-w_tA_t)g_t\ge0. R t := ∣ g t ∣ 2 − w t g t T A t g t = g t T ( I n − w t A t ) g t ≥ 0. There is also a terminal covariance bound. If g t ≠ 0 g_t\ne0 g t = 0 , set u t = g t / ∣ g t ∣ u_t=g_t/\abs{g_t} u t = g t / ∣ g t ∣ . Conditional Cauchy–Schwarz and (D18.11) yield
∣ g t ∣ 2 = Cov μ t ( f , u t ⋅ X ) 2 ≤ v t u t T A t u t ≤ v t w t \abs{g_t}^2
=\Cov_{\mu_t}(f,u_t\cdot X)^2
\le v_t\,u_t^TA_tu_t
\le\frac{v_t}{w_t} ∣ g t ∣ 2 = Cov μ t ( f , u t ⋅ X ) 2 ≤ v t u t T A t u t ≤ w t v t when w t > 0 w_t>0 w t > 0 ; the case g t = 0 g_t=0 g t = 0 is immediate. Thus, also with the evident convention at w t = 0 w_t=0 w t = 0 ,
w t ∣ g t ∣ 2 ≤ v t . w_t\abs{g_t}^2\le v_t. w t ∣ g t ∣ 2 ≤ v t . Compact smooth core and the fixed-function SDE. Assume temporarily that f ∈ C c ∞ ( R n ) f\in C_c^\infty(\R^n) f ∈ C c ∞ ( R n ) . Applying (D18.10) to f f f , to the coordinates, and to the components of f X fX f X gives
d m t = g t ⋅ d W t , d a t = A t d W t . \dd m_t=g_t\cdot\dd W_t,
\qquad
\dd a_t=A_t\dd W_t. d m t = g t ⋅ d W t , d a t = A t d W t . Moreover, with matrices oriented by Cov t ( f X , X ) i j = Cov t ( f X i , X j ) \Cov_t(fX,X)_{ij}=\Cov_t(fX_i,X_j) Cov t ( f X , X ) ij = Cov t ( f X i , X j ) ,
Cov t ( f X , X ) = H t + m t A t + a t ⊗ g t . \Cov_t(fX,X)=H_t+m_tA_t+a_t\otimes g_t. Cov t ( f X , X ) = H t + m t A t + a t ⊗ g t . Since g t = E t ( f X ) − m t a t g_t=\E_t(fX)-m_ta_t g t = E t ( f X ) − m t a t , Itô’s product rule, including d [ m , a ] t = A t g t d t \dd[m,a]_t=A_tg_t\dd t d [ m , a ] t = A t g t d t , now gives the exact equation
d g t = H t d W t − A t g t d t . \dd g_t=H_t\dd W_t-A_tg_t\dd t. d g t = H t d W t − A t g t d t . Itô’s formula and multiplication by w t w_t w t give
d ( w t ∣ g t ∣ 2 ) = 2 w t g t T H t d W t + ( w t ∥ H t ∥ H S 2 + 2 R t − ∣ g t ∣ 2 ) d t . \begin{aligned}
\dd\bigl(w_t\abs{g_t}^2\bigr)
&=2w_tg_t^TH_t\dd W_t \\
&\quad+
\left(w_t\norm{H_t}_{\HS}^2+2\mathcal R_t-\abs{g_t}^2\right)\dd t.
\end{aligned} d ( w t ∣ g t ∣ 2 ) = 2 w t g t T H t d W t + ( w t ∥ H t ∥ HS 2 + 2 R t − ∣ g t ∣ 2 ) d t . We justify taking expectations in this identity on a finite horizon. Fix T > 0 T>0 T > 0 and let
L t = ∫ 0 t 2 w s g s T H s d W s . L_t=\int_0^t2w_sg_s^TH_s\dd W_s. L t = ∫ 0 t 2 w s g s T H s d W s . The compact support of f f f and the Gaussian factor in (D18.8) make all posterior coefficients finite and continuous on compact time intervals. In particular L L L is a continuous local martingale with finite quadratic variation on [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] . Choose increasing stopping times τ N \tau_N τ N that simultaneously localize L L L and all finite-variation terms in (D18.18) , so that L τ N L^{\tau_N} L τ N is a square-integrable martingale and τ N ↑ ∞ \tau_N\uparrow\infty τ N ↑ ∞ almost surely, and write θ N = T ∧ τ N \theta_N=T\wedge\tau_N θ N = T ∧ τ N . Integrating (D18.18) to θ N \theta_N θ N gives
E ∫ 0 θ N ( w t ∥ H t ∥ H S 2 + 2 R t ) d t = E [ w θ N ∣ g θ N ∣ 2 ] − κ ∣ g 0 ∣ 2 + E ∫ 0 θ N ∣ g t ∣ 2 d t . \E\int_0^{\theta_N}
\left(w_t\norm{H_t}_{\HS}^2+2\mathcal R_t\right)\dd t
=\E\bigl[w_{\theta_N}\abs{g_{\theta_N}}^2\bigr]
-\kappa\abs{g_0}^2
+\E\int_0^{\theta_N}\abs{g_t}^2\dd t. E ∫ 0 θ N ( w t ∥ H t ∥ HS 2 + 2 R t ) d t = E [ w θ N ∣ g θ N ∣ 2 ] − κ ∣ g 0 ∣ 2 + E ∫ 0 θ N ∣ g t ∣ 2 d t . The stopped posterior variance pays exactly for the last two terms. Indeed, m m m is a bounded martingale for the present compactly supported f f f , so the stopped Itô isometry and the conditional-law property at θ N \theta_N θ N imply
E m θ N 2 − m 0 2 = E ∫ 0 θ N ∣ g t ∣ 2 d t , E v θ N = E μ f 2 − E m θ N 2 . \E m_{\theta_N}^2-m_0^2
=\E\int_0^{\theta_N}\abs{g_t}^2\dd t,
\qquad
\E v_{\theta_N}=\E_\mu f^2-\E m_{\theta_N}^2. E m θ N 2 − m 0 2 = E ∫ 0 θ N ∣ g t ∣ 2 d t , E v θ N = E μ f 2 − E m θ N 2 . Therefore
E v θ N + E ∫ 0 θ N ∣ g t ∣ 2 d t = Var μ ( f ) . \E v_{\theta_N}
+\E\int_0^{\theta_N}\abs{g_t}^2\dd t
=\Var_\mu(f). E v θ N + E ∫ 0 θ N ∣ g t ∣ 2 d t = Var μ ( f ) . Using (D18.14) in (D18.20) , followed by (D18.22) , yields
E ∫ 0 θ N ( w t ∥ H t ∥ H S 2 + 2 R t ) d t ≤ Var μ ( f ) − κ ∣ g 0 ∣ 2 . \E\int_0^{\theta_N}
\left(w_t\norm{H_t}_{\HS}^2+2\mathcal R_t\right)\dd t
\le\Var_\mu(f)-\kappa\abs{g_0}^2. E ∫ 0 θ N ( w t ∥ H t ∥ HS 2 + 2 R t ) d t ≤ Var μ ( f ) − κ ∣ g 0 ∣ 2 . Both terms in the integrand are nonnegative by (D18.12) . Since θ N ↑ T \theta_N\uparrow T θ N ↑ T , monotone convergence removes the stopping and proves (D18.6) for f ∈ C c ∞ ( R n ) f\in C_c^\infty(\R^n) f ∈ C c ∞ ( R n ) .
Closure from C c ∞ C_c^\infty C c ∞ to L 2 ( μ ) L^2(\mu) L 2 ( μ ) . Let now f ∈ L 2 ( μ ) f\in L^2(\mu) f ∈ L 2 ( μ ) be arbitrary, and choose f j ∈ C c ∞ ( R n ) f_j\in C_c^\infty(\R^n) f j ∈ C c ∞ ( R n ) with f j → f f_j\to f f j → f in L 2 ( μ ) L^2(\mu) L 2 ( μ ) . Denote by m j , g j , H j m^j,g^j,H^j m j , g j , H j the corresponding posterior quantities. For δ j = f j − f \delta_j=f_j-f δ j = f j − f , put M t j = E t δ j M_t^j=\E_t\delta_j M t j = E t δ j . The L 2 L^2 L 2 closure of (D18.10) and the martingale isometry give
E ∫ 0 T ∣ g t j − g t ∣ 2 d t = E ∣ M T j − M 0 j ∣ 2 ≤ ∥ δ j ∥ L 2 ( μ ) 2 . \E\int_0^T\abs{g_t^j-g_t}^2\dd t
=\E\left|M_T^j-M_0^j\right|^2
\le\norm{\delta_j}_{L^2(\mu)}^2. E ∫ 0 T ∣ ∣ g t j − g t ∣ ∣ 2 d t = E ∣ ∣ M T j − M 0 j ∣ ∣ 2 ≤ ∥ δ j ∥ L 2 ( μ ) 2 . Thus g j → g g^j\to g g j → g strongly in L 2 ( Ω × ( 0 , T ) ) L^2(\Omega\times(0,T)) L 2 ( Ω × ( 0 , T )) . Because 0 ⪯ I n − w t A t ⪯ I n 0\preceq I_n-w_tA_t\preceq I_n 0 ⪯ I n − w t A t ⪯ I n , this also gives
E ∫ 0 T R t ( f j ) d t ⟶ E ∫ 0 T R t ( f ) d t . \E\int_0^T\mathcal R_t(f_j)\dd t
\longrightarrow
\E\int_0^T\mathcal R_t(f)\dd t. E ∫ 0 T R t ( f j ) d t ⟶ E ∫ 0 T R t ( f ) d t . We next identify the tensor limit without assuming any weighted moment of f f f . A smooth log-concave probability has finite fourth moment. Conditional Jensen gives, uniformly in t ≥ 0 t\ge0 t ≥ 0 ,
E ∣ X − a t ∣ 4 ≤ 8 ( E ∣ X ∣ 4 + E ∣ a t ∣ 4 ) ≤ 16 E ∣ X ∣ 4 . \E\abs{X-a_t}^4
\le8\left(\E\abs X^4+\E\abs{a_t}^4\right)
\le16\E\abs X^4. E ∣ X − a t ∣ 4 ≤ 8 ( E ∣ X ∣ 4 + E ∣ a t ∣ 4 ) ≤ 16 E ∣ X ∣ 4 . Linearity of the centered posterior covariance shows that
H t j − H t = E t [ ( δ j − E t δ j ) ( X − a t ) ⊗ 2 ] . H_t^j-H_t
=\E_t\left[(\delta_j-\E_t\delta_j)(X-a_t)^{\otimes2}\right]. H t j − H t = E t [ ( δ j − E t δ j ) ( X − a t ) ⊗ 2 ] . Conditional Jensen, Cauchy–Schwarz, the tower property, and (D18.26) therefore imply, for a finite constant depending only on the fourth moment of this fixed μ \mu μ ,
sup t ≥ 0 E ∥ H t j − H t ∥ H S ≤ C μ ∥ δ j ∥ L 2 ( μ ) ⟶ 0. \sup_{t\ge0}\E\norm{H_t^j-H_t}_{\HS}
\le C_\mu\norm{\delta_j}_{L^2(\mu)}\longrightarrow0. t ≥ 0 sup E ∥ ∥ H t j − H t ∥ ∥ HS ≤ C μ ∥ δ j ∥ L 2 ( μ ) ⟶ 0. For completeness, the two terms bounded here are
E [ ∣ δ j ( X ) ∣ ∣ X − a t ∣ 2 ] and E [ ∣ E t δ j ∣ E t ∣ X − a t ∣ 2 ] ; \E\!\left[\abs{\delta_j(X)}\abs{X-a_t}^2\right]
\quad\text{and}\quad
\E\!\left[\abs{\E_t\delta_j}\,\E_t\abs{X-a_t}^2\right]; E [ ∣ δ j ( X ) ∣ ∣ X − a t ∣ 2 ] and E [ ∣ E t δ j ∣ E t ∣ X − a t ∣ 2 ] ; each is at most a fixed multiple of ∥ δ j ∥ L 2 ( μ ) ( E ∣ X ∣ 4 ) 1 / 2 \norm{\delta_j}_{L^2(\mu)}(\E\abs X^4)^{1/2} ∥ δ j ∥ L 2 ( μ ) ( E ∣ X ∣ 4 ) 1/2 .
The already proved estimate and nonnegativity of R t ( f j ) \mathcal R_t(f_j) R t ( f j ) show that H j H^j H j is bounded in the weighted Hilbert space appearing in the theorem. Extract a weakly convergent subsequence. The strong L 1 ( Ω × ( 0 , T ) ) L^1(\Omega\times(0,T)) L 1 ( Ω × ( 0 , T )) convergence in (D18.28) identifies its weak limit with the displayed posterior tensor H H H . Weak lower semicontinuity, together with (D18.25) , gives
E ∫ 0 T w t ∥ H t ∥ H S 2 d t + 2 E ∫ 0 T R t ( f ) d t ≤ lim inf j → ∞ ( E ∫ 0 T w t ∥ H t j ∥ H S 2 d t + 2 E ∫ 0 T R t ( f j ) d t ) ≤ lim j → ∞ ( Var μ ( f j ) − κ ∣ g 0 j ∣ 2 ) = Var μ ( f ) − κ ∣ g 0 ∣ 2 . \begin{aligned}
&\E\int_0^Tw_t\norm{H_t}_{\HS}^2\dd t
+2\E\int_0^T\mathcal R_t(f)\dd t\\
&\qquad\le
\liminf_{j\to\infty}\left(
\E\int_0^Tw_t\norm{H_t^j}_{\HS}^2\dd t
+2\E\int_0^T\mathcal R_t(f_j)\dd t\right)\\
&\qquad\le
\lim_{j\to\infty}\left(\Var_\mu(f_j)-\kappa\abs{g_0^j}^2\right)
=\Var_\mu(f)-\kappa\abs{g_0}^2.
\end{aligned} E ∫ 0 T w t ∥ H t ∥ HS 2 d t + 2 E ∫ 0 T R t ( f ) d t ≤ j → ∞ lim inf ( E ∫ 0 T w t ∥ ∥ H t j ∥ ∥ HS 2 d t + 2 E ∫ 0 T R t ( f j ) d t ) ≤ j → ∞ lim ( Var μ ( f j ) − κ ∣ ∣ g 0 j ∣ ∣ 2 ) = Var μ ( f ) − κ ∣ g 0 ∣ 2 . Here g 0 j → g 0 g_0^j\to g_0 g 0 j → g 0 because X ∈ L 2 ( μ ) X\in L^2(\mu) X ∈ L 2 ( μ ) . This proves the finite-horizon assertion for every f ∈ L 2 ( μ ) f\in L^2(\mu) f ∈ L 2 ( μ ) and, at the same time, proves the asserted weighted L 2 L^2 L 2 membership of H H H .
Finally set κ = 0 \kappa=0 κ = 0 . Dropping the nonnegative remainder term from the finite-horizon bound gives
E ∫ 0 T t ∥ H t ∥ H S 2 d t ≤ Var μ ( f ) \E\int_0^Tt\norm{H_t}_{\HS}^2\dd t\le\Var_\mu(f) E ∫ 0 T t ∥ H t ∥ HS 2 d t ≤ Var μ ( f ) for every T T T . Monotone convergence as T ↑ ∞ T\uparrow\infty T ↑ ∞ proves (D18.7) .