Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Restart deweighting at a stopping time

Part of the fixed-eigenfunction mechanism, Chapter The fixed eigenfunction: following one eigenfunction through localization; the reading order is on the full proofs page.

Overview. This dossier proves Lemma 21.4 as Theorem D15.1, unconditionally. For a regular approximant, a fixed test f∈L2(μ)f\in L^2(\mu) and a stopping time σ>0\sigma>0, the conditional unweighted source after σ\sigma is at most Var⁡μσ(f)/(ε+σ)≤vσ/σ\Var_{\mu_\sigma}(f)/(\varepsilon+\sigma)\le v_\sigma/\sigma ((D15.7)). The proof restarts the planted channel at σ\sigma with the posterior as new prior and applies Lemma 21.2 with curvature κ=ε+σ\kappa=\varepsilon+\sigma, conditionally on Fσ\mathcal F_\sigma. No unweighted statement at time zero is made.

  1. The pathwise tilt kernel (D15.4) is identified with the posterior at fixed times ((D15.9)). By dyadic approximation it is also identified at optional times ((D15.10)), so μσ\mu_\sigma is a regular conditional distribution and f∈L2(μσ)f\in L^2(\mu_\sigma).

  2. μσ\mu_\sigma is smooth and (ε+σ)(\varepsilon+\sigma)-strongly log-concave, so it lies in the admissible class of the time-weighted lemma.

  3. The innovation process is an (Ft)(\mathcal F_t)-Brownian motion with the strong Markov property (D15.13).

  4. Exact restart algebra: μσ+u\mu_{\sigma+u} is the tilt of μσ\mu_\sigma by the shifted observation ((D15.16)).

  5. The observation equation (D15.19) is well posed pathwise, by a Brascamp–Lieb Lipschitz bound and the Banach fixed-point theorem, and its solution map is measurable. This identifies the restarted path ((D15.22)).

  6. Steps 3–5 combine through freezing ((D15.25)): the conditional source equals a functional of a channel with frozen prior μσ\mu_\sigma ((D15.26)). Applying Lemma 21.2 with κ+u≥κ\kappa+u\ge\kappa bounds this functional and concludes.

Refined statement and standing. This dossier is unconditional. It restarts the planted localization channel at a stopping time σ\sigma of the observation filtration and applies the certified time-weighted source budget, Lemma 21.2 (certified dossier lem-mm-time-weighted-fixed-source.md in solutions/, checked_by: agent), conditionally on Fσ\mathcal F_\sigma with curvature parameter κ=ε+σ\kappa=\varepsilon+\sigma. The output trades the vanishing weight of the certified lemma for the value of the elapsed time: after σ\sigma, the unweighted source is controlled by vσ/σv_\sigma/\sigma. No unweighted statement at time zero, and no universal-time occupation claim, is made. The full restart construction — pathwise posterior kernel, optional-time posterior identification through regular conditional distributions, the innovation Brownian motion and its strong Markov property, the pathwise well-posedness of the observation equation, and the conditional transfer — is written out below.

Setting and conventions. Throughout, μ\mu is a regular approximant on Rn\R^n:

 dμ(x)=Z−1e−V(x) dx,V∈C∞(Rn),∇2V⪰εIn, ε>0.\dd\mu(x)=Z^{-1}e^{-V(x)}\dd x, \qquad V\in C^\infty(\R^n),\qquad \nabla^2V\succeq\varepsilon I_n,\ \varepsilon>0 .

(Centering and isotropy hold in the regular class of Section Setup and the exact fixed-function SDE but are not used in this lemma.) Strong log-concavity gives ∫eb∣x∣ dμ<∞\int e^{b\abs x}\dd\mu<\infty for every b>0b>0. Fix f∈L2(μ)f\in L^2(\mu). Take X∼μX\sim\mu, an independent standard Brownian motion BobsB^{\mathrm{obs}}, and the planted channel

ct=tX+Btobs.c_t=tX+B_t^{\mathrm{obs}} .

Let Ft0=σ(cs:0≤s≤t)\mathcal F^0_t=\sigma(c_s:0\le s\le t) be the raw observation filtration, N\mathcal N the P\Prob-null sets, and

Ft=⋂u>tσ(Fu0∪N)\mathcal F_t=\bigcap_{u>t}\sigma\bigl(\mathcal F^0_u\cup\mathcal N\bigr)

its usual augmentation, which is right-continuous and complete. All stopping times below are (Ft)(\mathcal F_t)-stopping times. Define the pathwise posterior kernel by the tilt formula

μt( dx)=exp⁡(ct⋅x−t∣x∣2/2)∫exp⁡(ct⋅y−t∣y∣2/2) dμ(y) μ( dx),t≥0,\mu_t(\dd x) =\frac{\exp\bigl(c_t\cdot x-t\abs x^2/2\bigr)} {\int\exp\bigl(c_t\cdot y-t\abs y^2/2\bigr)\dd\mu(y)}\,\mu(\dd x), \qquad t\ge0,

a measurable function of the pair (t,ct)(t,c_t) alone. At a stopping time σ\sigma we set μσ:=μt∣t=σ, ct=cσ\mu_\sigma:=\mu_t|_{t=\sigma,\,c_t=c_\sigma} on {σ<∞}\{\sigma<\infty\} (and, by convention, μσ:=μ\mu_\sigma:=\mu on {σ=∞}\{\sigma=\infty\}; this value is never used). Write

mt=∫f dμt,at=∫x  dμt,vt=Var⁡μt(f),At=Cov⁡μt(X),m_t=\textstyle\int f\dd\mu_t,\quad a_t=\int x\,\dd\mu_t,\quad v_t=\Var_{\mu_t}(f),\quad A_t=\Cov_{\mu_t}(X),

and define the centered tensor functional, for a probability ρ\rho on Rn\R^n,

H(ρ)=∫(f−∫f dρ)(x−∫y  dρ(y))⊗2 dρ(x)\mathsf H(\rho) =\int\Bigl(f-\textstyle\int f\dd\rho\Bigr) \Bigl(x-\textstyle\int y\,\dd\rho(y)\Bigr)^{\otimes2}\dd\rho(x)

whenever every displayed integral converges absolutely, and H(ρ)=0\mathsf H(\rho)=0 otherwise. Set Ht=H(μt)H_t=\mathsf H(\mu_t) for every t≥0t\ge0; off a  dt⊗ dP\dd t\otimes\dd\Prob-null set this is the absolutely convergent posterior tensor (as in Step 1 of the companion stopped-window dossier), so the convention alters no integral below.

Obstructions respected. The candidate node carries no bounded_by edge; the registered route fences were checked individually. No cut, slice, or excess estimate occurs (rem:two-tail-slice-bounds, rem:profile-circularity, rem:single-coordinate-cuts); no radial or projection test is promoted to a tensor estimate (rem:projection-ceiling); no crude or relative covariance occupation integral appears (rem:crude-insufficient, rem:relative-ceiling). The covariance operator norm is never bounded along a universal time interval, so the covariance-spike warning and Proposition 0.1 are not engaged. The scalar-multiplier weight-removal no-go is respected, not contradicted: the weight is not removed at time zero; it is exchanged for the elapsed time σ>0\sigma>0, exactly as that fence permits.

References
  1. Brascamp, H. J., & Lieb, E. H. (1976). On Extensions of the Brunn–Minkowski and Prékopa–Leindler Theorems, Including Inequalities for Log Concave Functions, and with an Application to the Diffusion Equation. Journal of Functional Analysis, 22(4), 366–389. 10.1016/0022-1236(76)90004-5